Object
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21310
Received: 02/09/2013
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
We object to the inclusion of Exemption Sites as contributing towards the housing figures as these will only meet the affordable needs, not overall need/housing demand. A similar argument applies to Windfall sites where there is likely to be a significant shortfall of housing. Therefore these windfalls are unlikely to meet the objectively assessed housing needs across the District.
The housing figure of 5700 is a MINIMUM. It is reasonable that this housing figure (5700) remains a minimum target that Windfall and Exemption Sites are removed given the Councils acknowledgement that it is not meeting identified housing need.
We object to the inclusion of Exemption Sites(65 units) as contributing towards the housing figures as these will only meet the affordable needs and not overall need or housing demand especially in rural areas which are likely to be restricted due to AONB. A similar argument applies to Windfall sites (460) where there is likely to be a significant shortfall of housing windfall sites in settlements that fall within the AONB. Therefore these windfall numbers are unlikely to meet the objectively assessed housing needs across the District.
The Councils housing figure of 5700 is a MINIMUM. It is therefore reasonable to ensure that this housing figure of 5700 remains a minimum target that Windfall and Exemption Sites are removed from the housing trajectory given the Councils own acknowledgement that it is not meeting its own identified housing need set out in its SHMA.