Support

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 21129

Received: 11/11/2011

Respondent: Highways Agency

Representation Summary:

We welcome this approach which demonstrates flexibility in accordance with PPS12. We note that the scale of development that could be delivered if the link road is not constructed is currently unknown. Given the high level of uncertainty surrounding link road funding we recommend this study be undertaken in advance of the EIP to provide a comprehensive assessment of impacts on the A259/A21.

Broad development areas in Bexhill, Hastings Fringe, Battle, Rye and surrounding villages are identified. In the event the link road is not constructed we support the policies that set out reduced development levels at Bexhill.

Full text:

This policy focuses on contingency planning in the event that the BHLR is not constructed. We welcome this approach which demonstrates Core Strategy flexibility in accordance with PPS12. We note however that the scale of development that could be delivered if the link road is not constructed is currently unknown. Given the high level of uncertainty surrounding the funding of the link road we recommend that this study be undertaken in advance of the EIP to provide a comprehensive assessment of the impact on the A259 and A21.

Development Allocations
Broad development areas in Bexhill, Hastings Fringe, Battle, Rye and surrounding villages are identified within the Core Strategy. The scale of development in Bexhill is dependent on the delivery of the BHLR. In the event that the link road is not constructed we support the policies that set out that the level of development at Bexhill will be reduced.