Comment

Representation ID: 18889

Received: 15/02/2007

Respondent: Strutt & Parker

It is difficult to see much distinction between Options 1 and 3 as this approach tends towards a polarization of facilities in a narrow range of settlements. If such an approach is taken then regard needs to be taken to their distribution, to ensure that their pattern is not such that pockets of isolation remain.

An even distribution of development is rarely practical or achievable, and focusing development opportunities solely on the basis of delivery of community facilities can discriminate against communities where there is no local political consensus. On balance, it is considered that continued support for principal service centres is an appropriate strategy, but making allowances for development elsewhere where this is demonstrably in support of community needs and facilities.