Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for Catsfield Parish Council search
New searchComment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
12. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
Representation ID: 27383
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
No comment. We don’t have sufficient knowledge to comment.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
13. What are your views on the proposed policy for water efficiency?
Representation ID: 27384
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
Agree.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
17. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for Renewable and Low Carbon Energy?
Representation ID: 27385
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
Agree these are good policies
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
18. What are your views on identifying broad locations for wind development?
Representation ID: 27386
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
Agree these are good policies.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
20. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for Local Nature Recovery Areas?
Representation ID: 27387
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
The Tree Warden agrees with the principle, but the delay of a year before any action document is prepared is disappointing. A Conservation Officer should oversee the report to be made for Rother by ESCC to ensure that it is perfectly applicable to Rother area. More than 'due regard' must then be applied to all Applications to ensure the aims of the Environment Act 2021 are addressed.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
21. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
Representation ID: 27388
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
All Applications should consider the proximity of Natura 2000 sites, particularly RAMSARS and SACs (e.g. in Pevensey) and as Rother is a Responsible Body must ensure that an Appropriate Assessment is prepared for any site within 15-20 km of any site - this being the distance that Natural England as being within the 'proximity'.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
22. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for Biodiversity Net Gain?
Representation ID: 27389
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
BNG is a good idea which flows from ideas in the Environment Act 2021, although the software is still not fit for purpose. Natural England have not yet produced templates for some kinds of development, such as solar farms. Rother need to list all exceptions unambiguously to BNG - working on what are already exceptions.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
23. What are your views on the Council going above the national minimum requirement of 10%?
Representation ID: 27390
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
Yes, agree 20%.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
24. Are there any alternatives or additional points the Council should be considering?
Representation ID: 27391
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
Rother should never permit building in any permanent TPO that they have designated. This is contrary to the whole effort of protecting nature.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
What are your views on the Council's proposed policy for the High Weald National Landscape?
Representation ID: 27392
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Catsfield Parish Council
Follow what the High Weald propose in their latest Management Plan.
