Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
Search representations
Results for Dallington Parish Council search
New searchComment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
63. What are your views on the distribution and opportunities for growth in settlements within the sub-area in figures 21, 22 & 23?
Representation ID: 27656
Received: 23/07/2024
Respondent: Dallington Parish Council
DPC notes that no potential development sites have been identified in the Draft Housing Economic and Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) within the Parish of Dallington. However, DPC is keen to seen affordable accommodation provided for younger parishioners and households and, consequently, should any potential exception sites become available it would be keen to help facilitate the provision of lower cost and (at least) carbon neutral units of accommodation, subject to them meeting local requirements for tenure, size and housing mix – and designs that complement (rather than harm) the High Weald National Landscape.
Notwithstanding the fact that there is little prospect of new build residential development within Dallington in the foreseeable future, DPC does have a concern about such development in surrounding parishes – particularly the larger settlements of Battle (our market town) and Robertsbridge. Any infrastructure deficiencies – for example, if health and medical services cannot meet the demands of rising local populations – are likely to impact Dallington parishioners adversely.
Dallington Parish Council (DPC) is of the view that there is little of concern within the Draft Rother District Local Plan.
DPC notes that no potential development sites have been identified in the Draft Housing Economic and Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) within the Parish of Dallington. However, DPC is keen to seen affordable accommodation provided for younger parishioners and households and, consequently, should any potential exception sites become available it would be keen to help facilitate the provision of lower cost and (at least) carbon neutral units of accommodation, subject to them meeting local requirements for tenure, size and housing mix – and designs that complement (rather than harm) the High Weald National Landscape.
Notwithstanding the fact that there is little prospect of new build residential development within Dallington in the foreseeable future, DPC does have a concern about such development in surrounding parishes – particularly the larger settlements of Battle (our market town) and Robertsbridge. Any infrastructure deficiencies – for example, if health and medical services cannot meet the demands of rising local populations – are likely to impact Dallington parishioners adversely.
Therefore, DPC would support a requirement that those applying for consent for developments above a certain number of units of accommodation should provide evidence of engagement with infrastructure providers. Adequate and accessible infrastructure should exist – or be put in place before, or shortly after, developments are completed.
Given that, because of high accommodation costs and poor public transport connectivity, younger parishioners are having to relocate to urban areas (notably Hastings/St Leonards), DPC has an interest in the provision of cheaper accommodation within neighbouring parishes/settlements.
The increasing tendency for developers to assert that 30% affordable housing is unachievable and, in fact, that even one unit of affordable accommodation would render a development unviable should be challenged regularly by Rother District Council (RDC) by way of commissioning independent viability assessments.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
109. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on strategic infrastructure requirements?
Representation ID: 27657
Received: 23/07/2024
Respondent: Dallington Parish Council
DPC would support a requirement that those applying for consent for developments above a certain number of units of accommodation should provide evidence of engagement with infrastructure providers. Adequate and accessible infrastructure should exist – or be put in place before, or shortly after, developments are completed.
Dallington Parish Council (DPC) is of the view that there is little of concern within the Draft Rother District Local Plan.
DPC notes that no potential development sites have been identified in the Draft Housing Economic and Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) within the Parish of Dallington. However, DPC is keen to seen affordable accommodation provided for younger parishioners and households and, consequently, should any potential exception sites become available it would be keen to help facilitate the provision of lower cost and (at least) carbon neutral units of accommodation, subject to them meeting local requirements for tenure, size and housing mix – and designs that complement (rather than harm) the High Weald National Landscape.
Notwithstanding the fact that there is little prospect of new build residential development within Dallington in the foreseeable future, DPC does have a concern about such development in surrounding parishes – particularly the larger settlements of Battle (our market town) and Robertsbridge. Any infrastructure deficiencies – for example, if health and medical services cannot meet the demands of rising local populations – are likely to impact Dallington parishioners adversely.
Therefore, DPC would support a requirement that those applying for consent for developments above a certain number of units of accommodation should provide evidence of engagement with infrastructure providers. Adequate and accessible infrastructure should exist – or be put in place before, or shortly after, developments are completed.
Given that, because of high accommodation costs and poor public transport connectivity, younger parishioners are having to relocate to urban areas (notably Hastings/St Leonards), DPC has an interest in the provision of cheaper accommodation within neighbouring parishes/settlements.
The increasing tendency for developers to assert that 30% affordable housing is unachievable and, in fact, that even one unit of affordable accommodation would render a development unviable should be challenged regularly by Rother District Council (RDC) by way of commissioning independent viability assessments.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
116. What are your views on the Council's proposed policy on affordable housing?
Representation ID: 27658
Received: 23/07/2024
Respondent: Dallington Parish Council
Given that, because of high accommodation costs and poor public transport connectivity, younger parishioners are having to relocate to urban areas (notably Hastings/St Leonards), DPC has an interest in the provision of cheaper accommodation within neighbouring parishes/settlements.
The increasing tendency for developers to assert that 30% affordable housing is unachievable and, in fact, that even one unit of affordable accommodation would render a development unviable should be challenged regularly by Rother District Council (RDC) by way of commissioning independent viability assessments.
Dallington Parish Council (DPC) is of the view that there is little of concern within the Draft Rother District Local Plan.
DPC notes that no potential development sites have been identified in the Draft Housing Economic and Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) within the Parish of Dallington. However, DPC is keen to seen affordable accommodation provided for younger parishioners and households and, consequently, should any potential exception sites become available it would be keen to help facilitate the provision of lower cost and (at least) carbon neutral units of accommodation, subject to them meeting local requirements for tenure, size and housing mix – and designs that complement (rather than harm) the High Weald National Landscape.
Notwithstanding the fact that there is little prospect of new build residential development within Dallington in the foreseeable future, DPC does have a concern about such development in surrounding parishes – particularly the larger settlements of Battle (our market town) and Robertsbridge. Any infrastructure deficiencies – for example, if health and medical services cannot meet the demands of rising local populations – are likely to impact Dallington parishioners adversely.
Therefore, DPC would support a requirement that those applying for consent for developments above a certain number of units of accommodation should provide evidence of engagement with infrastructure providers. Adequate and accessible infrastructure should exist – or be put in place before, or shortly after, developments are completed.
Given that, because of high accommodation costs and poor public transport connectivity, younger parishioners are having to relocate to urban areas (notably Hastings/St Leonards), DPC has an interest in the provision of cheaper accommodation within neighbouring parishes/settlements.
The increasing tendency for developers to assert that 30% affordable housing is unachievable and, in fact, that even one unit of affordable accommodation would render a development unviable should be challenged regularly by Rother District Council (RDC) by way of commissioning independent viability assessments.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
69. What are your views on the distribution and opportunities for growth in settlements within the sub-area in figures 29, 30 & 31?
Representation ID: 27659
Received: 23/07/2024
Respondent: Dallington Parish Council
Notwithstanding the fact that there is little prospect of new build residential development within Dallington in the foreseeable future, DPC does have a concern about such development in surrounding parishes – particularly the larger settlements of Battle (our market town) and Robertsbridge. Any infrastructure deficiencies – for example, if health and medical services cannot meet the demands of rising local populations – are likely to impact Dallington parishioners adversely.
Dallington Parish Council (DPC) is of the view that there is little of concern within the Draft Rother District Local Plan.
DPC notes that no potential development sites have been identified in the Draft Housing Economic and Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) within the Parish of Dallington. However, DPC is keen to seen affordable accommodation provided for younger parishioners and households and, consequently, should any potential exception sites become available it would be keen to help facilitate the provision of lower cost and (at least) carbon neutral units of accommodation, subject to them meeting local requirements for tenure, size and housing mix – and designs that complement (rather than harm) the High Weald National Landscape.
Notwithstanding the fact that there is little prospect of new build residential development within Dallington in the foreseeable future, DPC does have a concern about such development in surrounding parishes – particularly the larger settlements of Battle (our market town) and Robertsbridge. Any infrastructure deficiencies – for example, if health and medical services cannot meet the demands of rising local populations – are likely to impact Dallington parishioners adversely.
Therefore, DPC would support a requirement that those applying for consent for developments above a certain number of units of accommodation should provide evidence of engagement with infrastructure providers. Adequate and accessible infrastructure should exist – or be put in place before, or shortly after, developments are completed.
Given that, because of high accommodation costs and poor public transport connectivity, younger parishioners are having to relocate to urban areas (notably Hastings/St Leonards), DPC has an interest in the provision of cheaper accommodation within neighbouring parishes/settlements.
The increasing tendency for developers to assert that 30% affordable housing is unachievable and, in fact, that even one unit of affordable accommodation would render a development unviable should be challenged regularly by Rother District Council (RDC) by way of commissioning independent viability assessments.