Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for Icklesham Parish Council search
New searchComment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 86: Do you agree with the proposed development boundary? If not, how would you like to see it amended?
Representation ID: 22784
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council
The revised development boundary supported.
The revised development boundary supported.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 87: Do you agree with Policy RHA2 regarding the Harbour Road Industrial Estate and the proposed boundary changes? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?
Representation ID: 22785
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council
Support the extension to the boundary and recommend the following changes to the policy:
(i) Proposals which result in a significant increase in vehicles, especially HGV movements at the junction of Harbour Road and the A259 will only be permitted with the agreement of the Highways Authority.
(ii) It is demonstrated that a competent person has prepared an assessment of any contamination of the site, and prepared a scheme of mitigation, together with a scheme to provide surface water drainage.
Support the extension to the boundary and recommend the following changes to the policy:
(i) Proposals which result in a significant increase in vehicles, especially HGV movements at the junction of Harbour Road and the A259 will only be permitted with the agreement of the Highways Authority.
(ii) It is demonstrated that a competent person has prepared an assessment of any contamination of the site, and prepared a scheme of mitigation, together with a scheme to provide surface water drainage.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 96: Do you agree with the recommendation to retain the development boundary at Icklesham in its existing form? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to th
Representation ID: 22786
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council
The boundary is supported.
The boundary is supported.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 102: Do you agree with the recommendation to retain the development boundary at Winchelsea in its existing form? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to
Representation ID: 22787
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council
The boundary is supported.
The boundary is supported.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 103: Do you agree with the recommendation to remove the development boundary at Winchelsea Beach? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this settlement
Representation ID: 22788
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council
Object to the deletion of the development boundary. It should be kept. The rationale does not sit happily with the recommendations for Rye Harbour which has broadly the same level of flood risk. You should either keep both development boundaries or delete both.
Object to the deletion of the development boundary. It should be kept. The rationale does not sit happily with the recommendations for Rye Harbour which has broadly the same level of flood risk. You should either keep both development boundaries or delete both.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 107: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Guestling Green? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22789
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council
The majority of patients attending Chapel Lane surgery live in Icklesham parish. While our preference would be for a site within the parish, in the absence of identifying any suitable site, we support the allocation.
The majority of patients attending Chapel Lane surgery live in Icklesham parish. While our preference would be for a site within the parish, in the absence of identifying any suitable site, we support the allocation.
