Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for Icklesham Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 13: Do you agree with the proposed policy approach to extensions to residential gardens and the proposed policy wording? If not, what changes would you wish to see?

Representation ID: 22774

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Object-the policy is badly worded and shows a lack of understanding. The policy needs to go back to referring to residential curtilage. A garden is defined in the Dictionary as an area of land to grow fruit/vegetables. That in planning terms is defined as agriculture and thus there is no change of use unless the boundary between the residential curtilage and the plot is removed. A residential curtilage is not necessarily used as a garden but often is used solely as an extension to a dwelling with all the attendant domestic paraphernalia, which has no place in open countryside.

Full text:

Object to the policy because it is badly worded and shows a lack of understanding of the subject matter. The policy needs to go back to referring to residential curtilage. A garden is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as an area of land to grow fruit and vegetables. That in planning terms is defined as agriculture and thus there is no change of use of the land unless the boundary between the residential curtilage and the plot is removed. A residential curtilage is not, as your policy wording suggests, necessarily used as a garden but often is used solely as an extension to a dwelling with all the attendant domestic paraphernalia, which has no place in the open countryside.

The replacement of the words 'residential garden' with the words 'residential curtilage' would overcome the objection.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 14: Do you agree with the policy approach to extensions, annexes, alterations and outbuildings and the wording of the respective policies? If not, what changes would you wish to see?

Representation ID: 22775

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Object to the policies as too restrictive. The following changes are suggested:

In the preamble at para 8.57 add the words "from the Local Planning Authority" after 'planning permission'.

Retain Policy HG8 of the 2006 Local Plan and issue design guidance. It is easier to update guidance than policies.

For annexes. Option B is the preferred choice. We are concerned that the policy gives no thought to the short term needs but seems to assume all annexes will be permanent. This need not necessarily be the case.

Full text:

Object to the policies as too restrictive. The following changes are suggested:

In the preamble at para 8.57 add the words "from the Local Planning Authority" after 'planning permission'.

Retain Policy HG8 of the 2006 Local Plan and issue design guidance. It is easier to update guidance than policies.

For annexes. Option B is the preferred choice. We are concerned that the policy gives no thought to the short term needs but seems to assume all annexes will be permanent. This need not necessarily be the case.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 15: Do you agree with the policy approaches to boundary treatments and drives and accesses and to the wording of the proposed cies? If not, what changes would you wish to see?

Representation ID: 22776

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support the policies.

Full text:

Support the policies.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 17: Do you agree with the policy approach to existing employment sites and the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 22777

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support the policy.

Full text:

Support the policy.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 18: Do you agree with the policy approaches to maintaining landscape character and the High Weald AONB and to the respective proposed policy wordings?

Representation ID: 22778

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support the policies.

Full text:

Support the policies.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 19: Do you agree with the proposed definition of the Strategic Gaps, and the policy applying to them? If not, what changes would you wish to see?

Representation ID: 22779

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support the policy.

Full text:

Support the policy.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 21: Do you agree with the policy approach to sustainable drainage and the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 22780

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support the policy.

Full text:

Support the policy.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 23: Do you agree with the policy approach to managing environmental pollution through the planning process and with the proposed policy wording?

Representation ID: 22781

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support the policy in principle but request amendment of the wording to allow appropriate development on existing sites where the development can be shown to be necessary to maintain local employment.

Full text:

Support the policy in principle but request amendment of the wording to allow appropriate development on existing sites where the development can be shown to be necessary to maintain local employment.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 84: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Rye Harbour? If not, which site should be preferred?

Representation ID: 22782

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support the policy.

Full text:

Support the policy.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

QUESTION 85: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy RHA1? If not, how would you wish to see it amended?

Representation ID: 22783

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: Icklesham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support the policy.

Full text:

Support the policy.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.