Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for High Weald AONB Unit search
New searchComment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 55: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Beckley Four Oaks? If not, which sites should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22075
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
No objection to the proposed allocations in Beckley Four Oaks. According to the Historic Landscape Characterisation site FO12 is early post medieval (1500-1599) regular piecemeal enclosure in origin, and site FP15 is late 19th/20th century field amalgamation. Both sites have historic field boundaries that should be protected.
No objection to the proposed allocations in Beckley Four Oaks. According to the Historic Landscape Characterisation site FO12 is early post medieval (1500-1599) regular piecemeal enclosure in origin, and site FP15 is late 19th/20th century field amalgamation. Both sites have historic field boundaries that should be protected.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 47: Do you agree with the preferred site for housing development along the Hastings Fringes? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22076
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
No objection to the proposed allocation of site HF4 on the Hastings Fringe.
No objection to the proposed allocation of site HF4 on the Hastings Fringe.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 59: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Broad Oak? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22077
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
No objection to the proposed allocation of site BO17. According to the Historic Landscape Characterisation BO17 is early post medieval (1500-1599) with historic field boundaries that should be protected.
No objection to the proposed allocation of the residential curtilages within BO16.
However, the pasture in the western part of the site is classified as medieval (1066-1499) aggregate assart in the Historic Landscape Characterisation and should not be developed where there are alternatives of a later origin within the village as medieval fields are a key AONB landscape component. The AONB Unit objects to the allocation of this part of BO16.
No objection to the proposed allocation of site BO17 in Broad Oak . According to the Historic Landscape Characterisation site BO17 is early post medieval (1500-1599) with historic field boundaries that should be protected.
No objection to the proposed allocation of the residential curtilages within site BO16 in Broad Oak.
However, the pasture in the western part of the site is classified as medieval (1066-1499) aggregate assart in the Historic Landscape Characterisation and should not be developed where there are alternatives of a later origin within the village as medieval fields are a key landscape component of the AONB. The AONB Unit therefore objects to the allocation of this part of the site.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 67: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Catsfield? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22078
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
No objection to the proposed allocation of sites CA12 and CA6 in Catsfield . According to the Historic Landscape Characterisation site CA12 is late 19th century regular piecemeal enclosure with historic field boundaries that should be protected.
No objection to the proposed allocation of sites CA12 and CA6 in Catsfield . According to the Historic Landscape Characterisation site CA12 is late 19th century regular piecemeal enclosure with historic field boundaries that should be protected.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 71: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Hurst Green? If not, which sites should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22079
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
No objection to the proposed allocation of sites HG18 and HG17 in Hurst Green . According to the Historic Landscape Characterisation site HG18 is early post medieval (1500-1599) regular piecemeal enclosure with historic field boundaries that should be protected. There is also a historic droveway on the southern boundary and it is understood that there may be important archaeological remains on the site that should be investigated prior to a final decision on the development potential of this site. Site HG17 is an existing commercial site.
No objection to the proposed allocation of sites HG18 and HG17 in Hurst Green . According to the Historic Landscape Characterisation site HG18 is early post medieval (1500-1599) regular piecemeal enclosure with historic field boundaries that should be protected. There is also a historic droveway on the southern boundary and it is understood that there may be important archaeological remains on the site that should be investigated prior to a final decision on the development potential of this site. Site HG17 is an existing commercial site.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 75: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Iden? If not, which site(s) should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22080
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
No objection to the proposed allocation of site ID 1a in Iden.
No objection to the proposed allocation of site ID 1a in Iden.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 78: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Northiam? If not, which site should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22081
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
No objection to the proposed allocation of site NO15 in Northiam.
No objection to the proposed allocation of site NO15 in Northiam.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 81: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Peasmarsh? If not, which site should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22082
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
No objection to the proposed allocation of site PS24 in Peasmarsh. The Historic Landscape Characterisation classifies this site as late 19th century regular piecemeal enclosure with historic field boundaries that should be protected.
No objection to the proposed allocation of site PS24 in Peasmarsh. The Historic Landscape Characterisation classifies this site as late 19th century regular piecemeal enclosure with historic field boundaries that should be protected.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 88: Do you agree with the preferred site for development at Westfield? If not, which site should be preferred?
Representation ID: 22083
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
No objection to the proposed allocation of sites WF26, WF23 and WF6E for residential development and WF27 as a green corridor in Westfield. Site WF26 is classified in the Historic Landscape Characterisation as 19th century private planned enclosure. The proposed green corridor on WF27 is classified as post medieval (1500-1599) private planned enclosure.
No objection to the proposed allocation of sites WF26, WF23 and WF6E for residential development and WF27 as a green corridor in Westfield. Site WF26 is classified in the Historic Landscape Characterisation as 19th century private planned enclosure. The proposed green corridor on WF27 is classified as post medieval (1500-1599) private planned enclosure.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
QUESTION 18: Do you agree with the policy approaches to maintaining landscape character and the High Weald AONB and to the respective proposed policy wordings?
Representation ID: 22084
Received: 17/01/2017
Respondent: High Weald AONB Unit
The High Weald AONB Unit supports the proposed policy approaches to maintaining landscape character and the High Weald AONB and the respective policy wordings.
The High Weald AONB Unit supports the proposed policy approaches to maintaining landscape character and the High Weald AONB and the respective policy wordings.
