Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Search representations

Results for Transport Futures East Sussex search

New search New search

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Paragraph a

Representation ID: 19425

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Transport Futures East Sussex

Representation Summary:

In viii, we disagree that a new station at Wilting will fulfil sustainability criteria. We believe it will create more traffic and undermine stations in urban locations.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Paragraph a

Representation ID: 19426

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Transport Futures East Sussex

Representation Summary:

We support a station at Glyne Gap and a reopened station at St Leonards West Marina.

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Paragraph b

Representation ID: 19427

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Transport Futures East Sussex

Representation Summary:

At b iv (c), we do not agree that this is a demand management measure, while at b vii we recognise the greatly increased opportunities for short car trips will undermine sustainable alternatives.

We believe that there is no reason for a dichotomy between the 'Strategic' and the 'Local'. They have a strong inextricable relationship

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 27 - Aims and Objectives for the Environment

Representation ID: 19428

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Transport Futures East Sussex

Representation Summary:

We feel that the 'Environment' section acknowledges the very special assets administered by RDC and we feel very positive about this section.

However, there are contradictions between this section and the 'Economy' section that appear to result from a less than holistic approach to drafting the LDF.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.