Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Search representations
Results for Transport Futures East Sussex search
New searchObject
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Paragraph a
Representation ID: 19425
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: Transport Futures East Sussex
In viii, we disagree that a new station at Wilting will fulfil sustainability criteria. We believe it will create more traffic and undermine stations in urban locations.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Paragraph a
Representation ID: 19426
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: Transport Futures East Sussex
We support a station at Glyne Gap and a reopened station at St Leonards West Marina.
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Paragraph b
Representation ID: 19427
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: Transport Futures East Sussex
At b iv (c), we do not agree that this is a demand management measure, while at b vii we recognise the greatly increased opportunities for short car trips will undermine sustainable alternatives.
We believe that there is no reason for a dichotomy between the 'Strategic' and the 'Local'. They have a strong inextricable relationship
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 27 - Aims and Objectives for the Environment
Representation ID: 19428
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: Transport Futures East Sussex
We feel that the 'Environment' section acknowledges the very special assets administered by RDC and we feel very positive about this section.
However, there are contradictions between this section and the 'Economy' section that appear to result from a less than holistic approach to drafting the LDF.