Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Search representations

Results for Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 5 - Preferred Strategy for Development Boundaries

Representation ID: 19202

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Development Potential - We find the existing development boundaries very useful and wish to retain and if possible enhance them - in particular we would like the planning strategy strengthened in relation to development along Brightling Road between Knelle Road and Bugsell Lane to retain the rural aspect of this road and not allow any further development along it.

Full text:

Development Potential - We find the existing development boundaries very useful and wish to retain and if possible enhance them - in particular we would like the planning strategy strengthened in relation to development along Brightling Road between Knelle Road and Bugsell Lane to retain the rural aspect of this road and not allow any further development along it.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 5 - Preferred Strategy for Development Boundaries

Representation ID: 19204

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Any residential development at the former Mill site should be included in the total allocation for Robertsbridge and not to be treated as 'windfall'. All 'infill' developments should be counted as part of the increased housing allocation for Robertsbridge.

Full text:

Any residential development at the former Mill site should be included in the total allocation for Robertsbridge and not to be treated as 'windfall'. All 'infill' developments should be counted as part of the increased housing allocation for Robertsbridge.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 7 - Preferred Strategy for ensuring appropriately high quality development

Representation ID: 19205

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

We Support the proposals but in addition, we feel that more emphasis should be placed in new building design on ensuring that porous surfacing should be used for driveways etc. - especially important in areas prone to flooding from river or surface run-off such as Robertsbridge - and more emphasis placed on energy efficiency.

Full text:

We Support the proposals but in addition, we feel that more emphasis should be placed in new building design on ensuring that porous surfacing should be used for driveways etc. - especially important in areas prone to flooding from river or surface run-off such as Robertsbridge - and more emphasis placed on energy efficiency.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 17 - Preferred Strategy for Villages

Representation ID: 19207

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

(C) For the Historic Environment - we Support the proposal to protect the locally distinctive character of historic buildings and settings and to this end would wish to see assessments for the historic settlements at Salehurst and Northbridge Street to see if they should be included in the Conservation Area schedule.

Full text:

(b) For Services and Community Development - we Support the proposals but would like to see a strengthening of the protection of business premises against conversion to residential. Without this the village designation as a 'service centre is at risk.

(C) For the Historic Environment - we Support the proposal to protect the locally distinctive character of historic buildings and settings and to this end would wish to see assessments for the historic settlements at Salehurst and Northbridge Street to see if they should be included in the Conservation Area schedule.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 18 - Preferred Strategy for Countryside

Representation ID: 19208

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

We Support the ELR suggestion to provide more support and encouragement for local businesses. In addition, we feel that more emphasis should be given to supporting and encouraging equestrians businesses which are an import contributor to the economy and the creation of employment in the rural areas.

Full text:

We Support the ELR suggestion to provide more support and encouragement for local businesses. In addition, we feel that more emphasis should be given to supporting and encouraging equestrians businesses which are an import contributor to the economy and the creation of employment in the rural areas.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 20 - Preferred Strategy for Housing

Representation ID: 19211

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

We feel that this is especially important in the rural villages.

Full text:

We feel that this is especially important in the rural villages.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Option b

Representation ID: 19213

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Particularly important in the rural villages

Full text:

Particularly important in the rural villages

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Option a ii

Representation ID: 19214

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Particularly important in the rural villages

Full text:

Particularly important in the rural villages

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 22 - Preferred Strategy for Gypsies and Travellers

Representation ID: 19215

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Comment (iii) When considering rural sites the size of site should be limited in relation to any adjacent community. Any proposal to increase the size of the existing site at Robertsbridge would not be acceptable. The larger the site the more it encourages isolation and discourages long-term integration into the community.

Full text:

Comment (iii) When considering rural sites the size of site should be limited in relation to any adjacent community. Any proposal to increase the size of the existing site at Robertsbridge would not be acceptable. The larger the site the more it encourages isolation and discourages long-term integration into the community.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 23 - Preferred Strategy for Older People

Representation ID: 19216

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Salehurst & Robertsbridge Parish Council

Representation Summary:

we Support the proposals but would like to see the inclusion of a sheltered/assisted housing scheme for Robertsbridge. This could free up larger houses but enable older residents to stay close to their relatives and friends and allow them to continue their existing social interaction and interests.

Full text:

we Support the proposals but would like to see the inclusion of a sheltered/assisted housing scheme for Robertsbridge. This could free up larger houses but enable older residents to stay close to their relatives and friends and allow them to continue their existing social interaction and interests.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.