North East Bexhill Masterplan

Search representations

Results for East Sussex County Council search

New search New search

Comment

North East Bexhill Masterplan

5. Development principles

Representation ID: 19020

Received: 27/07/2007

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Concern is expressed over the timely delivery of education facilities.

Paragraphs 5.75-5.77 relate to County Council Service and several detailed amendments to paragraphs 5.76 and 5.77 are sought.

An additional paragraph relating to contributions to the Pebsham Countryside Park is proposed.

Under paragraph 5.86 the intention to provide cycle routes is welcomed and routes should link St Richards Catholic College and Bexhill High School.

Comment

North East Bexhill Masterplan

6. Land north of Pebsham

Representation ID: 19021

Received: 27/07/2007

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Re: Figure 8 and paragraphs 6.49, 6.54 due to the topography of the land, the school would be more appropriately located north of Upper Worsham Farm.

Re: paragraph 6.50, the County Council does not intend to build a nursery school at this location but, would wish to see relevant childcare facilities ideally attached to the school or community facilities.

Under Paragraph 6.51, library access points should be added.

For suggested amendments see original letter

Comment

North East Bexhill Masterplan

7. Land north of Sidley

Representation ID: 19022

Received: 27/07/2007

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Both South East Plan and Rother's Issues and Options discuss the potential for development to the west of Bexhill. It is important that the disposition of development does not foreclose opportunities to enhance access to the A269

Comment

North East Bexhill Masterplan

8. Implementation

Representation ID: 19023

Received: 27/07/2007

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

The Highway Authority may also wish to secure Local Sustainable Access Improvement Contributions (LSAIC) in accordance with its adopted SPG. Any development which is to be occupied in advance of the Link Road would have to be supported by a Transport Assessment. The use of Watermill Lane to serve the western area development will also need to demonstrate that highway safety for users will not be compromised and that the streets and junctions in this area can accommodate additional traffic.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.