9.102

I am writing regarding the proposed sites in the Bexhill St Marks ward.

I am concerned about the proposed scale of development (in terms of number of houses) which will result from the site allocations BEX9 and 10 (land off Spindlewood Drive and at Northey). Whilst I recognise that there is a requirement that a minimum number of new houses are built in Rother, (when the development underway in Rosewood Park is taken into consideration), has St Marks been allocated more than its fair share of new homes?

The two largest developments are countryside/outside the existing development zones and border Pevensey Levels. Can we be sure there will not be adverse environmental impact? This is particularly important given that the new 25 year Environmental Plan calls for us to leave the environment in a better shape (rather than merely minimise adverse environmental impacts). The plan highlights the 'sense of remoteness' characteristic of Pevensey Levels, but proposes developments which would impinge on these characteristics. Can more be done to protect the remote characteristics of the Levels?

The scale of the developments may significantly alter the 'village' nature of Little Common. This is distinct from the larger area of Bexhill and an important reason why many of us live in this part of East Sussex (rather than in Bexhill). Can we find a number of smaller sites to develop in St Marks, thus preserving the local character.

Could smaller sites (and likely numbers of annual windfall sites) be developed in such a way as to support local builders (rather than the major national constructors). Could this also enable Rother DC to guide development in the direction of likely future housing needs. This is likely to include an increase in the population aged 65 and over whose housing needs vary significantly (e.g.) from workers commuting long distances.

Once these questions are answered, what else can be done to address residents concerns about infrastructure, road safety and other issues.

Finally, I welcome the recognition by the plan that many people value 'dark skies' and the reference to guidance on lighting. I would specifically like to see steps taken to enforce lighting guidance in rural and semi-rural area such as Pevensey Levels and bordering areas thus maintaining and ideally reducing levels of light pollution in the area.

Whilst I have written this in a personal capacity, as I am standing as a Conservative candidate for Bexhill St Marks ward in the May District Council elections, I am aware of significant concerns amongst residents about the level of development in the Little Common area. I have, therefore, taken the views of fellow residents into consideration when writing this.

Nigel Jacklin