QUESTION 63: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Camber? If not, which sites should be preferred?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 23572

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Landscape

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS

Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.

Full text:

Landscape

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS

Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 23647

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Camber

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Camber

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 23741

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Camber

Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.

Full text:

Ecology

VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219

Camber

Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.