QUESTION 63: Do you agree with the preferred sites for development at Camber? If not, which sites should be preferred?
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 23572
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Landscape
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS
Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.
Landscape
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS
Yes to all questions - Agree and support all of the village boundary and other policies.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 23647
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Archaeology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Yes
Archaeology
Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF.
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Yes
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 23741
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.
Ecology
VILLAGES WITH SITE ALLOCATIONS page 219
Camber
Development should not increase the need for coastal protection.