MOD 18.1
Object
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21350
Received: 09/09/2013
Respondent: Ms Alison Cooper
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
This is appalling....first you encourage more car use and pollution by building another unrequired road and then you change your mind about building a train station at Glyne Gap? Have we not moved on? Are we still fawning to the corporate powers? Are we still not taking the environmental impact of these projects seriously?
Shame on you.
This is appalling....first you encourage more car use and pollution by building another unrequired road and then you change your mind about building a train station at Glyne Gap? Have we not moved on? Are we still fawnng to the corporate powers? Are we still not taking the environmental impact of these projects seriously?
Shame on you.
Support
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21362
Received: 18/09/2013
Respondent: Highways Agency
We are aware that an updated transport study (July 2013) has been produced as part of the supporting documentation. This document will form part of the evidence base and highlights the impact on the strategic road network. The modelling will help inform any future mitigation and so the HA will review the study and provide further comments
We are aware that an updated transport study (July 2013) has been produced as part of the supporting documentation. This document will form part of the evidence base and highlights the impact on the strategic road network. The modelling will help inform any future mitigation and so the HA will review the study and provide further comments
Object
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21576
Received: 27/09/2013
Respondent: Rother and Hastings CPRE
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
We believe that for sustainability reasons as well as public policy reasons the proposal to put a station at Glyne Gap should be in then plan. Even with the BHLR there will be substantial traffic around the Glyne Gap area and a positive proposal to use and enhance existing public transport facilities should be grasped. Previous studies have shown pollution levels on De La Warr Road are high. Post BHLR they will still be high, enhanced by increased traffic to the revamped shopping area. So public transport access is absolutely needed.
We believe that for sustainability reasons as well as public policy reasons the proposal to put a station at Glyne Gap should be in then plan. Even with the BHLR there will be substantial traffic around the Glyne Gap area and a positive proposal to use and enhance existing public transport facilities should be grasped. Previous studies have shown pollution levels on De La Warr Road are high. Post BHLR they will still be high, enhanced by increased traffic to the revamped shopping area. So public transport access is absolutely needed.