Object

Proposed Submission Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan

Representation ID: 24319

Received: 06/12/2018

Respondent: Town and Country Planning Solutions

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Paragraph 4.57 states that "having regard to current overall likely demand, it will be expected that reasonably-sized housing schemes of 20+ dwellings, include a proportion of self and custom-build plots, being at least 5% and this then appears as a requirement in Policy DHG6 (Self-build and custom housing). There is no such requirement with the NPPF (2018) and such a requirement could prejudice large sites of 20 or more units coming forward, especially if the delivery of the scheme were to be delayed to provide for relevant marketing of 'service plots for self and custom housebuilders' for a period of "at least 12 months".

It is also difficult to envisage how a site of 20 or more dwellings can be properly laid out and for any visual impact to be assessed if part of a site is left as 'serviced plots for self and custom housebuilders'. There is no evidence that the introduction of a 'design code' (for which there is no Policy commitment) would satisfactorily overcome this issue. The draft Policy should be amended to include only the first paragraph.

Full text:

Paragraph 4.57 states that "having regard to current overall likely demand, it will be expected that reasonably-sized housing schemes of 20+ dwellings, include a proportion of self and custom-build plots, being at least 5% and this then appears as a requirement in Policy DHG6 (Self-build and custom housing). There is no such requirement with the NPPF (2018) and such a requirement could prejudice large sites of 20 or more units coming forward, especially if the delivery of the scheme were to be delayed to provide for relevant marketing of 'service plots for self and custom housebuilders' for a period of "at least 12 months".

It is also difficult to envisage how a site of 20 or more dwellings can be properly laid out and for any visual impact to be assessed if part of a site is left as 'serviced plots for self and custom housebuilders'. There is no evidence that the introduction of a 'design code' (for which there is no Policy commitment) would satisfactorily overcome this issue. The draft Policy should be amended to include only the first paragraph.