Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20666
Received: 30/09/2011
Respondent: J BLOCK
Agent: Mr NICK IDE
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
* This states that the contribution of windfalls may be such that inter alia certain other sites are not developed. If this were to apply to sites identified in the Site Allocations DPD, this would introduce yet more uncertainty. I note that this comment forms part of the reasoned justification and is not draft policy as such. Allocated sites in the SADPD should be safeguarded. It is the case windfall sites could be refused on housing supply grounds.
* This states that the contribution of windfalls may be such that inter alia certain other sites are not developed. If this were to apply to sites identified in the Site Allocations DPD, this would introduce yet more uncertainty. I note that this comment forms part of the reasoned justification and is not draft policy as such. Allocated sites in the SADPD should be safeguarded. It is the case windfall sites could be refused on housing supply grounds.