Object

Representation ID: 19906

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd

Agent: Charles Planning Associates Limited

Disappointing that SHLAA not made available at the level of development which it projects will occur. Without sight of the SHLAA, assumptions made by the Council cannot be commented on, and the robustness of the Strategy cannot be accurately assessed.

Preferred Option 2 is supported in principle, however does not take account of the constraints.It is doubtful that the projected housing numbers at the four locations as set out in the table are realistic.
Option 3 provides the clear indication of where development is likely to continue as this represents where development has recently been delivered. In all therefore, it is considered that a more realistic approach would be a hybrid of Options 2 and 3.