Object

Representation ID: 19605

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Rother and Hastings CPRE

Para 5.79 We contest absolutely this statement. It is simply not true: significant growth, if needed, can be accommodated without the BHLR. There were substantial submissions about this to the planning application, but the application was decided on political grounds, not planning ones. Therefore this and subsequent paragraphs fall because they are based on a totally false premise.