Comment

Representation ID: 19019

Received: 06/09/2007

Respondent: Trinity College

Agent: Bidwells

The final SPD should provide greater clarity about the expected contributions to be delivered through the Section 106. Priorities should be identified.

A viable development is fundamental and flexibility for unexpected costs is needed.

The SPD should clarify whether developers of the market housing are expected to subsidise the S106 requirements that will arise from the affordable housing element.

The SPD should set out a contingency plan should land ownership issues become a barrier to development. Possible future development should be taken into account in road design.