Rother Local Plan 2025-2042 – Development Strategy and Site Allocations

Search representations

Results for NHS Property Services search

New search New search

Object

Rother Local Plan 2025-2042 – Development Strategy and Site Allocations

Q5

Representation ID: 31218

Received: 23/03/2026

Respondent: NHS Property Services

Representation Summary:

Acknowledges the role of the IDP in supporting the preparation and implementation of the Local Plan, and that health has been included in the list of infrastructure types in the IDP.

Suggests that health infrastructure should be included as a key priority within the Local Plan, with expectation that development proposals will make provision to meet the cost of health care infrastructure where necessary.

Emphasises the importance of effective implementation mechanisms so that infrastructure is delivered alongside new development, especially for primary health care services. Suggests the Local Plan sets out a section to clarify how developer contributions will be secured, for individual and cumulative impacts of growth and development.

The Local Plan should emphasise that the NHS and its partners will need to work with the Council in the formulation of appropriate mitigation measures. NHSPS recommends that the Council engage with the relevant Integrated Care Board (ICB) to add further detail within the Local Plan and supporting evidence base (Infrastructure Delivery Plan) regarding the process for determining the appropriate form of contribution towards the provision of healthcare infrastructure where this is justified.

Healthcare providers should have flexibility in determining the most appropriate means of meeting the relevant healthcare needs arising from a new development. This includes options to secure financial contributions towards or direct delivery of infrastructure.

Object

Rother Local Plan 2025-2042 – Development Strategy and Site Allocations

Q69

Representation ID: 31219

Received: 23/03/2026

Respondent: NHS Property Services

Representation Summary:

Evidence base

A sound IDP must include sufficient detail to provide clarity around the healthcare infrastructure required to support growth, and to ensure that both planning obligations and the capital allocation processes for the CIL effectively support and result in capital funding towards delivery of the required infrastructure.

Related to this, appropriate healthcare costs should be factored into the Local Plan Viability Assessment for relevant typologies. Such an approach means that developers are adequately informed in advance that they may be required to make contributions towards healthcare infrastructure. A separate cost input for health infrastructure in the plan viability assessment would ensure that healthcare mitigation is appropriately weighted when evaluating the potential planning obligations necessary to mitigate the full impact of a development. This is particularly important in situations where a viability assessment demonstrates that proposals are unable to fund the full range of infrastructure requirements.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.