Rother Local Plan 2025-2042 – Development Strategy and Site Allocations

Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.










Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.

















Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.


















IDEN PARISH COUNCIL
Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.

Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.










Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.

















Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.


















IDEN PARISH COUNCIL
Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.

Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.










Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.

















Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.


















IDEN PARISH COUNCIL
Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.