Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Search representations
Results for Strategic Land Kent Ltd search
New search
New search
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd
Representation Summary:
MOD 7.18. At the proposed paragraph 7.57 the Council is taking windfalls into account. In terms of making an assessment of the 5 year land supply, is the Council making an allowance for the non implementation of planning permissions. We suggest that a percentage figure based on evidence be used in order to have a fair methodology.
Full text:
We are pleased that the document no takes on board the thrust of the new LPPF document and no longer refers to the defuncy South East Plan. The increases in housing supply are welcomed which will aid to create a more prosperous local economy which will in turn be significantly beneficial to local communities.
MOD2.2 The inserted text is welcomed but we see no necessity for the final sentence which makes reference to the South East Plan which is no longer applicable, by referencing it as a document only causes unnecessary confusion. Future infrastructure investment should now be based on the new LocalPlan. The final sentence should be deleted.
MOD 7.1 The new reference to the 4,800 dwellings as set out in the South East Plan is unnecessary.
MOD 7.5 The increased supply to at least 5,700 is to be welcomed.
MOD-7.6 We seek to alter the proposed paragraph 7.30 as follows: (changes in CAPS)
7.30 This growth is justified primarily in terms of COMPLYING WITH THE NPPF TO INCREASE HOUSING SUPPLY AND contributing to the projected demand for new homes, as well as in meeting the local need for housing and the need to support economic regeneration. The possibility of further opportunities for sustainable housing (as well as employment) development arising over time is A DISTINCT POSSIBILITY; hence the requirement is expressed as a minimum QUANTUM for the purposes of plan making. These will be further assessed as part of site allocations/neighbourhood planning processes.
MOD 7.9 With regard to the additional sentence; please consider adding 'modest' prior to 'potential' and insert 'detailed' prior to 'assessment'.
MOD 7.10 Please delete the additional modification as it is not necessary.
MOD 7.12 The increased housing provision figures at 5,700 are welcome as a minimum provision.
MOD 7.13 After the words 'sites are assessed' please add 'or subject to planning applications'.
MOD 7.14 Figure 8; the increase for the Villages to have 1,670 dwellings is welcomed.
MOD 7.18. At the proposed paragraph 7.57 the Council is taking windfalls into account. In terms of making an assessment of the 5 year land supply, is the Council making an allowance for the non implementation of planning permissions. We suggest that a percentage figure based on evidence be used in order to have a fair methodology.
MOD 8.5. Add on to the modification 'and that this delivery rate will be monitored on an annual basis'.
MOD 8.7. Delete 'support' or 'deliver' and add on to the final sentence 'or to allocate fresh housing land via planning permissions or alternative allocations'.
MOD 8.10. Delete 'marginal but critical' for 'strategically important'.
MOD 9.1 We object to the inclusion of the modification and seek that it be deleted.
MOD 12.4. We support the additional dwelling supply.
MOD 12.6. After 'Neighbourhood Plans', please add on 'or newly approved planning permissions'
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd
Representation Summary:
MOD 8.5. Add on to the modification 'and that this delivery rate will be monitored on an annual basis'.
Full text:
We are pleased that the document no takes on board the thrust of the new LPPF document and no longer refers to the defuncy South East Plan. The increases in housing supply are welcomed which will aid to create a more prosperous local economy which will in turn be significantly beneficial to local communities.
MOD2.2 The inserted text is welcomed but we see no necessity for the final sentence which makes reference to the South East Plan which is no longer applicable, by referencing it as a document only causes unnecessary confusion. Future infrastructure investment should now be based on the new LocalPlan. The final sentence should be deleted.
MOD 7.1 The new reference to the 4,800 dwellings as set out in the South East Plan is unnecessary.
MOD 7.5 The increased supply to at least 5,700 is to be welcomed.
MOD-7.6 We seek to alter the proposed paragraph 7.30 as follows: (changes in CAPS)
7.30 This growth is justified primarily in terms of COMPLYING WITH THE NPPF TO INCREASE HOUSING SUPPLY AND contributing to the projected demand for new homes, as well as in meeting the local need for housing and the need to support economic regeneration. The possibility of further opportunities for sustainable housing (as well as employment) development arising over time is A DISTINCT POSSIBILITY; hence the requirement is expressed as a minimum QUANTUM for the purposes of plan making. These will be further assessed as part of site allocations/neighbourhood planning processes.
MOD 7.9 With regard to the additional sentence; please consider adding 'modest' prior to 'potential' and insert 'detailed' prior to 'assessment'.
MOD 7.10 Please delete the additional modification as it is not necessary.
MOD 7.12 The increased housing provision figures at 5,700 are welcome as a minimum provision.
MOD 7.13 After the words 'sites are assessed' please add 'or subject to planning applications'.
MOD 7.14 Figure 8; the increase for the Villages to have 1,670 dwellings is welcomed.
MOD 7.18. At the proposed paragraph 7.57 the Council is taking windfalls into account. In terms of making an assessment of the 5 year land supply, is the Council making an allowance for the non implementation of planning permissions. We suggest that a percentage figure based on evidence be used in order to have a fair methodology.
MOD 8.5. Add on to the modification 'and that this delivery rate will be monitored on an annual basis'.
MOD 8.7. Delete 'support' or 'deliver' and add on to the final sentence 'or to allocate fresh housing land via planning permissions or alternative allocations'.
MOD 8.10. Delete 'marginal but critical' for 'strategically important'.
MOD 9.1 We object to the inclusion of the modification and seek that it be deleted.
MOD 12.4. We support the additional dwelling supply.
MOD 12.6. After 'Neighbourhood Plans', please add on 'or newly approved planning permissions'
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd
Representation Summary:
MOD 8.7. Delete 'support' or 'deliver' and add on to the final sentence 'or to allocate fresh housing land via planning permissions or alternative allocations'..
Full text:
We are pleased that the document no takes on board the thrust of the new LPPF document and no longer refers to the defuncy South East Plan. The increases in housing supply are welcomed which will aid to create a more prosperous local economy which will in turn be significantly beneficial to local communities.
MOD2.2 The inserted text is welcomed but we see no necessity for the final sentence which makes reference to the South East Plan which is no longer applicable, by referencing it as a document only causes unnecessary confusion. Future infrastructure investment should now be based on the new LocalPlan. The final sentence should be deleted.
MOD 7.1 The new reference to the 4,800 dwellings as set out in the South East Plan is unnecessary.
MOD 7.5 The increased supply to at least 5,700 is to be welcomed.
MOD-7.6 We seek to alter the proposed paragraph 7.30 as follows: (changes in CAPS)
7.30 This growth is justified primarily in terms of COMPLYING WITH THE NPPF TO INCREASE HOUSING SUPPLY AND contributing to the projected demand for new homes, as well as in meeting the local need for housing and the need to support economic regeneration. The possibility of further opportunities for sustainable housing (as well as employment) development arising over time is A DISTINCT POSSIBILITY; hence the requirement is expressed as a minimum QUANTUM for the purposes of plan making. These will be further assessed as part of site allocations/neighbourhood planning processes.
MOD 7.9 With regard to the additional sentence; please consider adding 'modest' prior to 'potential' and insert 'detailed' prior to 'assessment'.
MOD 7.10 Please delete the additional modification as it is not necessary.
MOD 7.12 The increased housing provision figures at 5,700 are welcome as a minimum provision.
MOD 7.13 After the words 'sites are assessed' please add 'or subject to planning applications'.
MOD 7.14 Figure 8; the increase for the Villages to have 1,670 dwellings is welcomed.
MOD 7.18. At the proposed paragraph 7.57 the Council is taking windfalls into account. In terms of making an assessment of the 5 year land supply, is the Council making an allowance for the non implementation of planning permissions. We suggest that a percentage figure based on evidence be used in order to have a fair methodology.
MOD 8.5. Add on to the modification 'and that this delivery rate will be monitored on an annual basis'.
MOD 8.7. Delete 'support' or 'deliver' and add on to the final sentence 'or to allocate fresh housing land via planning permissions or alternative allocations'.
MOD 8.10. Delete 'marginal but critical' for 'strategically important'.
MOD 9.1 We object to the inclusion of the modification and seek that it be deleted.
MOD 12.4. We support the additional dwelling supply.
MOD 12.6. After 'Neighbourhood Plans', please add on 'or newly approved planning permissions'
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd
Representation Summary:
MOD 8.10. Delete 'marginal but critical' for 'strategically important'.
Full text:
We are pleased that the document no takes on board the thrust of the new LPPF document and no longer refers to the defuncy South East Plan. The increases in housing supply are welcomed which will aid to create a more prosperous local economy which will in turn be significantly beneficial to local communities.
MOD2.2 The inserted text is welcomed but we see no necessity for the final sentence which makes reference to the South East Plan which is no longer applicable, by referencing it as a document only causes unnecessary confusion. Future infrastructure investment should now be based on the new LocalPlan. The final sentence should be deleted.
MOD 7.1 The new reference to the 4,800 dwellings as set out in the South East Plan is unnecessary.
MOD 7.5 The increased supply to at least 5,700 is to be welcomed.
MOD-7.6 We seek to alter the proposed paragraph 7.30 as follows: (changes in CAPS)
7.30 This growth is justified primarily in terms of COMPLYING WITH THE NPPF TO INCREASE HOUSING SUPPLY AND contributing to the projected demand for new homes, as well as in meeting the local need for housing and the need to support economic regeneration. The possibility of further opportunities for sustainable housing (as well as employment) development arising over time is A DISTINCT POSSIBILITY; hence the requirement is expressed as a minimum QUANTUM for the purposes of plan making. These will be further assessed as part of site allocations/neighbourhood planning processes.
MOD 7.9 With regard to the additional sentence; please consider adding 'modest' prior to 'potential' and insert 'detailed' prior to 'assessment'.
MOD 7.10 Please delete the additional modification as it is not necessary.
MOD 7.12 The increased housing provision figures at 5,700 are welcome as a minimum provision.
MOD 7.13 After the words 'sites are assessed' please add 'or subject to planning applications'.
MOD 7.14 Figure 8; the increase for the Villages to have 1,670 dwellings is welcomed.
MOD 7.18. At the proposed paragraph 7.57 the Council is taking windfalls into account. In terms of making an assessment of the 5 year land supply, is the Council making an allowance for the non implementation of planning permissions. We suggest that a percentage figure based on evidence be used in order to have a fair methodology.
MOD 8.5. Add on to the modification 'and that this delivery rate will be monitored on an annual basis'.
MOD 8.7. Delete 'support' or 'deliver' and add on to the final sentence 'or to allocate fresh housing land via planning permissions or alternative allocations'.
MOD 8.10. Delete 'marginal but critical' for 'strategically important'.
MOD 9.1 We object to the inclusion of the modification and seek that it be deleted.
MOD 12.4. We support the additional dwelling supply.
MOD 12.6. After 'Neighbourhood Plans', please add on 'or newly approved planning permissions'
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd
Representation Summary:
MOD 12.4. We support the additional dwelling supply.
Full text:
We are pleased that the document no takes on board the thrust of the new LPPF document and no longer refers to the defuncy South East Plan. The increases in housing supply are welcomed which will aid to create a more prosperous local economy which will in turn be significantly beneficial to local communities.
MOD2.2 The inserted text is welcomed but we see no necessity for the final sentence which makes reference to the South East Plan which is no longer applicable, by referencing it as a document only causes unnecessary confusion. Future infrastructure investment should now be based on the new LocalPlan. The final sentence should be deleted.
MOD 7.1 The new reference to the 4,800 dwellings as set out in the South East Plan is unnecessary.
MOD 7.5 The increased supply to at least 5,700 is to be welcomed.
MOD-7.6 We seek to alter the proposed paragraph 7.30 as follows: (changes in CAPS)
7.30 This growth is justified primarily in terms of COMPLYING WITH THE NPPF TO INCREASE HOUSING SUPPLY AND contributing to the projected demand for new homes, as well as in meeting the local need for housing and the need to support economic regeneration. The possibility of further opportunities for sustainable housing (as well as employment) development arising over time is A DISTINCT POSSIBILITY; hence the requirement is expressed as a minimum QUANTUM for the purposes of plan making. These will be further assessed as part of site allocations/neighbourhood planning processes.
MOD 7.9 With regard to the additional sentence; please consider adding 'modest' prior to 'potential' and insert 'detailed' prior to 'assessment'.
MOD 7.10 Please delete the additional modification as it is not necessary.
MOD 7.12 The increased housing provision figures at 5,700 are welcome as a minimum provision.
MOD 7.13 After the words 'sites are assessed' please add 'or subject to planning applications'.
MOD 7.14 Figure 8; the increase for the Villages to have 1,670 dwellings is welcomed.
MOD 7.18. At the proposed paragraph 7.57 the Council is taking windfalls into account. In terms of making an assessment of the 5 year land supply, is the Council making an allowance for the non implementation of planning permissions. We suggest that a percentage figure based on evidence be used in order to have a fair methodology.
MOD 8.5. Add on to the modification 'and that this delivery rate will be monitored on an annual basis'.
MOD 8.7. Delete 'support' or 'deliver' and add on to the final sentence 'or to allocate fresh housing land via planning permissions or alternative allocations'.
MOD 8.10. Delete 'marginal but critical' for 'strategically important'.
MOD 9.1 We object to the inclusion of the modification and seek that it be deleted.
MOD 12.4. We support the additional dwelling supply.
MOD 12.6. After 'Neighbourhood Plans', please add on 'or newly approved planning permissions'
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Representation Summary:
MOD 9.1 We object to the inclusion of the modification and seek that it be deleted.
Full text:
We are pleased that the document no takes on board the thrust of the new LPPF document and no longer refers to the defuncy South East Plan. The increases in housing supply are welcomed which will aid to create a more prosperous local economy which will in turn be significantly beneficial to local communities.
MOD2.2 The inserted text is welcomed but we see no necessity for the final sentence which makes reference to the South East Plan which is no longer applicable, by referencing it as a document only causes unnecessary confusion. Future infrastructure investment should now be based on the new LocalPlan. The final sentence should be deleted.
MOD 7.1 The new reference to the 4,800 dwellings as set out in the South East Plan is unnecessary.
MOD 7.5 The increased supply to at least 5,700 is to be welcomed.
MOD-7.6 We seek to alter the proposed paragraph 7.30 as follows: (changes in CAPS)
7.30 This growth is justified primarily in terms of COMPLYING WITH THE NPPF TO INCREASE HOUSING SUPPLY AND contributing to the projected demand for new homes, as well as in meeting the local need for housing and the need to support economic regeneration. The possibility of further opportunities for sustainable housing (as well as employment) development arising over time is A DISTINCT POSSIBILITY; hence the requirement is expressed as a minimum QUANTUM for the purposes of plan making. These will be further assessed as part of site allocations/neighbourhood planning processes.
MOD 7.9 With regard to the additional sentence; please consider adding 'modest' prior to 'potential' and insert 'detailed' prior to 'assessment'.
MOD 7.10 Please delete the additional modification as it is not necessary.
MOD 7.12 The increased housing provision figures at 5,700 are welcome as a minimum provision.
MOD 7.13 After the words 'sites are assessed' please add 'or subject to planning applications'.
MOD 7.14 Figure 8; the increase for the Villages to have 1,670 dwellings is welcomed.
MOD 7.18. At the proposed paragraph 7.57 the Council is taking windfalls into account. In terms of making an assessment of the 5 year land supply, is the Council making an allowance for the non implementation of planning permissions. We suggest that a percentage figure based on evidence be used in order to have a fair methodology.
MOD 8.5. Add on to the modification 'and that this delivery rate will be monitored on an annual basis'.
MOD 8.7. Delete 'support' or 'deliver' and add on to the final sentence 'or to allocate fresh housing land via planning permissions or alternative allocations'.
MOD 8.10. Delete 'marginal but critical' for 'strategically important'.
MOD 9.1 We object to the inclusion of the modification and seek that it be deleted.
MOD 12.4. We support the additional dwelling supply.
MOD 12.6. After 'Neighbourhood Plans', please add on 'or newly approved planning permissions'
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd
Representation Summary:
MOD 12.6. After 'Neighbourhood Plans', please add on 'or newly approved planning permissions'
Full text:
We are pleased that the document no takes on board the thrust of the new LPPF document and no longer refers to the defuncy South East Plan. The increases in housing supply are welcomed which will aid to create a more prosperous local economy which will in turn be significantly beneficial to local communities.
MOD2.2 The inserted text is welcomed but we see no necessity for the final sentence which makes reference to the South East Plan which is no longer applicable, by referencing it as a document only causes unnecessary confusion. Future infrastructure investment should now be based on the new LocalPlan. The final sentence should be deleted.
MOD 7.1 The new reference to the 4,800 dwellings as set out in the South East Plan is unnecessary.
MOD 7.5 The increased supply to at least 5,700 is to be welcomed.
MOD-7.6 We seek to alter the proposed paragraph 7.30 as follows: (changes in CAPS)
7.30 This growth is justified primarily in terms of COMPLYING WITH THE NPPF TO INCREASE HOUSING SUPPLY AND contributing to the projected demand for new homes, as well as in meeting the local need for housing and the need to support economic regeneration. The possibility of further opportunities for sustainable housing (as well as employment) development arising over time is A DISTINCT POSSIBILITY; hence the requirement is expressed as a minimum QUANTUM for the purposes of plan making. These will be further assessed as part of site allocations/neighbourhood planning processes.
MOD 7.9 With regard to the additional sentence; please consider adding 'modest' prior to 'potential' and insert 'detailed' prior to 'assessment'.
MOD 7.10 Please delete the additional modification as it is not necessary.
MOD 7.12 The increased housing provision figures at 5,700 are welcome as a minimum provision.
MOD 7.13 After the words 'sites are assessed' please add 'or subject to planning applications'.
MOD 7.14 Figure 8; the increase for the Villages to have 1,670 dwellings is welcomed.
MOD 7.18. At the proposed paragraph 7.57 the Council is taking windfalls into account. In terms of making an assessment of the 5 year land supply, is the Council making an allowance for the non implementation of planning permissions. We suggest that a percentage figure based on evidence be used in order to have a fair methodology.
MOD 8.5. Add on to the modification 'and that this delivery rate will be monitored on an annual basis'.
MOD 8.7. Delete 'support' or 'deliver' and add on to the final sentence 'or to allocate fresh housing land via planning permissions or alternative allocations'.
MOD 8.10. Delete 'marginal but critical' for 'strategically important'.
MOD 9.1 We object to the inclusion of the modification and seek that it be deleted.
MOD 12.4. We support the additional dwelling supply.
MOD 12.6. After 'Neighbourhood Plans', please add on 'or newly approved planning permissions'
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.
