Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Object

Representation ID: 21384

Received: 25/09/2013

Respondent: Dallington Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Too large a jump from 4,800 to 6,180.

Object

Representation ID: 21386

Received: 25/09/2013

Respondent: Dallington Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

We question the achievable target. There is no scope for the employment development in our rural areas.

Object

Representation ID: 21387

Received: 25/09/2013

Respondent: Dallington Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Quite impossible to achieve a 48% increase, the target should be for local need only and not projected demand from elsewhere. This will be an unfair weight stressed on our area.

Object

Representation ID: 21388

Received: 25/09/2013

Respondent: Dallington Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Retain original paragraph and do not use insertion.

Object

Representation ID: 21389

Received: 25/09/2013

Respondent: Dallington Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

We see this as excessive development. Retain original paragraph and do not use insertion.

Object

Representation ID: 21390

Received: 25/09/2013

Respondent: Dallington Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Retain original paragraph, do not use insertion.

Object

Representation ID: 21391

Received: 25/09/2013

Respondent: Dallington Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Regarding villages, this is an unfair increase in dwellings, there is no employment, transport, poor broadband and this will destroy the integrity and character of our rural villages.