Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Search representations
Results for Croudace Strategic Ltd search
New searchSupport
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
MOD 7.1
Representation ID: 21341
Received: 25/09/2013
Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd
Agent: Portchester Planning Consultancy
Replacement paragraph 7.10 is supported because it is based on an up-to-date assessment of housing need derived from the June 2013 'Strategic Housing Market Assessment Update: Housing Needs Assessment' which has had regard to paragraphs 47 and 159 of the National Planning policy Framework (NPPF) March 2012.
Replacement paragraph 7.10 is supported because it is based on an up-to-date assessment of housing need derived from the June 2013 'Strategic Housing Market Assessment Update: Housing Needs Assessment' which has had regard to paragraphs 47 and 159 of the National Planning policy Framework (NPPF) March 2012.
Support
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
MOD 7.11
Representation ID: 21345
Received: 25/09/2013
Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd
Agent: Portchester Planning Consultancy
The additional sentence is supported because it acknowledges that the villages, especially the larger Rural Service Centres (such as Robertsbridge), have a greater capacity to absorb additional development than the plan has previously recognised.
The additional sentence is supported because it acknowledges that the villages, especially the larger Rural Service Centres (such as Robertsbridge), have a greater capacity to absorb additional development than the plan has previously recognised.
Support
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
MOD 7.14
Representation ID: 21348
Received: 25/09/2013
Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd
Agent: Portchester Planning Consultancy
The increase in the housing requirement for the 'villages' from 950-1,000 (set out in the Proposed Submission Core Strategy) to 1,670 additional dwellings, set out in Figure 8, for the period 2011-2028 is supported because this more realistically reflects the capacity of the larger villages, such as the Rural Service Centre of Robertsbridge, to accommodate additional development.
The increase in the housing requirement for the 'villages' from 950-1,000 (set out in the Proposed Submission Core Strategy) to 1,670 additional dwellings, set out in Figure 8, for the period 2011-2028 is supported because this more realistically reflects the capacity of the larger villages, such as the Rural Service Centre of Robertsbridge, to accommodate additional development.
Support
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
MOD 12.1
Representation ID: 21351
Received: 25/09/2013
Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd
Agent: Portchester Planning Consultancy
The revisions to paragraph 12.13 are supported because they are based on an increased overall housing requirement of 'at least' 5,700 additional dwellings in the period 2011 to 2028, derived from the SHMA Update: Housing Needs Assessment (June 2013). Further, the increased allocation for the 'villages' is supported as this acknowledges that the villages, especially the larger Rural Service Centres (such as Robertsbridge) have a greater capacity to absorb additional development than the draft plan has previously recognised.
The revisions to paragraph 12.13 are supported because they are based on an increased overall housing requirement of 'at least' 5,700 additional dwellings in the period 2011 to 2028, derived from the SHMA Update: Housing Needs Assessment (June 2013). Further, the increased allocation for the 'villages' is supported as this acknowledges that the villages, especially the larger Rural Service Centres (such as Robertsbridge) have a greater capacity to absorb additional development than the draft plan has previously recognised.
Support
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
MOD 12.2
Representation ID: 21352
Received: 25/09/2013
Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd
Agent: Portchester Planning Consultancy
Replacement paragraph 12.14 is supported because it acknowledges that the villages, especially the larger Rural Service Centres (such as Robertsbridge) have greater capacity to absorb additional development than the draft plan has previously recognised.
Replacement paragraph 12.14 is supported because it acknowledges that the villages, especially the larger Rural Service Centres (such as Robertsbridge) have greater capacity to absorb additional development than the draft plan has previously recognised.
Support
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
MOD 12.4
Representation ID: 21353
Received: 25/09/2013
Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd
Agent: Portchester Planning Consultancy
Replacement Policy RA1 is supported because it is based on an increased overall housing requirement of 'at least' 5,700 additional dwellings in the period 2011-to 2028, derived from the SHMA Update: Housing Needs Assessment (June 2013), which is supported. Further, the increased allocation for the villages of 1,670 dwellings is also supported because it acknowledges that the villages, especially the larger Rural Service Centres (such as Robertsbridge) have greater capacity to absorb additional development than the draft plan has previously recognised.
Replacement Policy RA1 is supported because it is based on an increased overall housing requirement of 'at least' 5,700 additional dwellings in the period 2011-to 2028, derived from the SHMA Update: Housing Needs Assessment (June 2013), which is supported. Further, the increased allocation for the villages of 1,670 dwellings is also supported because it acknowledges that the villages, especially the larger Rural Service Centres (such as Robertsbridge) have greater capacity to absorb additional development than the draft plan has previously recognised.
Support
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
MOD 12.5
Representation ID: 21354
Received: 25/09/2013
Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd
Agent: Portchester Planning Consultancy
Replacement Figure 12 is supported.
Replacement Figure 12 is supported because it is based on an increased overall housing requirement of 'at least' 5,700 additional dwellings in the district in the period 2011 to 2028 derived from the SHMA Update: Housing Needs Assessment (June 2013, which is supported. Further, the increased figure for the villages of 1,670 additional dwellings is also supported as it acknowledges that the villages have greater capacity to absorb additional development than the draft plan has previously recognised. In addition, the increased development in the larger Rural Service Centres (such as Robertsbridge) will contribute to the vitality, viability and sustainability of those settlements.
Support
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
MOD A3.1
Representation ID: 21355
Received: 25/09/2013
Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd
Agent: Portchester Planning Consultancy
Replacement Appendix 3 is supported because it reflects the increased overall housing requirement of 'at least' 5,700 additional dwellings for the period 2011 to 2028. Further, Appendix 3 also reflects the increase in the allocation for the villages to 1,670 additional dwellings in the plan period, which is supported.
Replacement Appendix 3 is supported because it reflects the increased overall housing requirement of 'at least' 5,700 additional dwellings for the period 2011 to 2028. Further, Appendix 3 also reflects the increase in the allocation for the villages to 1,670 additional dwellings in the plan period, which is supported.
