Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Search representations

Results for Tunbridge Wells Borough Council search

New search New search

Support

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA3

Representation ID: 21241

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Representation Summary:

This amendment will help to ensure that development is focused in the most sustainable locations.

Full text:

This amendment will help to ensure that development is focused in the most sustainable locations.

Support

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA6

Representation ID: 21242

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Representation Summary:

This amendment strengthens the policy on villages in line with the NPPF, by providing for the retention of, and support for, local services.

Full text:

This amendment strengthens the policy on villages in line with the NPPF, by providing for the retention of, and support for, local services.

Support

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA8

Representation ID: 21243

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Representation Summary:

This is a useful clarification.

Full text:

This is a useful clarification.

Support

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA9

Representation ID: 21244

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Representation Summary:

This approach is similar to that of Tunbridge Wells Borough Council, also the latter also includes a criterion restricting new dwellings where a dwelling has been sold off separately from the site or holding during the previous 10 years.

Full text:

This approach is similar to that of Tunbridge Wells Borough Council, also the latter also includes a criterion restricting new dwellings where a dwelling has been sold off separately from the site or holding during the previous 10 years.

Support

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA10

Representation ID: 21245

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Representation Summary:

This amendment is in response to objections received and evidence that affordable housing providers are unlikely to take on such properties. It seems sensible as conversions of this type may be technically complex and/or costly, making them less viable for affordable housing, and the location may be less suitable in terms of access to services etc than other sites (eg rural exceptions). The cross-reference to the general affordable housing policy ensures that some provision for affordable housing is retained.

Full text:

This amendment is in response to objections received and evidence that affordable housing providers are unlikely to take on such properties. It seems sensible as conversions of this type may be technically complex and/or costly, making them less viable for affordable housing, and the location may be less suitable in terms of access to services etc than other sites (eg rural exceptions). The cross-reference to the general affordable housing policy ensures that some provision for affordable housing is retained.

Support

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA11

Representation ID: 21246

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Representation Summary:

This amendment is welcome as it helps to identify protected species habitats.

Full text:

This amendment is welcome as it helps to identify protected species habitats.

Object

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA12

Representation ID: 21247

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Removing the requirement to assess the potential of solar, wind and biomass energy, requiring only an assessment of the potential for CHP in very large schemes, seems a regressive step, particularly as all new housing developments must be 'zero carbon' by 2016. It is suggested that a requirement to assess the potential for low carbon and renewable technologies is retained in the policy.

Full text:

Removing the requirement for developments to assess the potential of solar, wind and biomass energy, requiring only an assessment of the potential for combined heat and power in very large schemes, seems a rather regressive step, particularly given the requirement for all new housing developments to be 'zero carbon' by 2016: most commercially available combined heat and power technologies are fuelled by gas and so contribute to reducing carbon dioxide emissions only by improving the efficiency of energy generation. It is suggested that the Council consider that the requirement to assess the potential for low carbon and renewable technologies is retained in the policy (without making reference to specific technologies, in order to retain the widest possible scope of technological solutions). However, we support the reduction of the threshold for requiring an energy strategy from 100 dwellings to 10 dwellings.

Support

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA13

Representation ID: 21248

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Representation Summary:

We agree that ecological and heritage issues should be amongst the potential environmental constraints considered in the assessment of stand-alone renewable energy generation proposals.

Full text:

We agree that ecological and heritage issues should be amongst the potential environmental constraints considered in the assessment of stand-alone renewable energy generation proposals.

Support

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA17

Representation ID: 21250

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Representation Summary:

We support this amendment on the basis that further advice on specific water efficiency measures will be given in a later DPD. The amendment provides more flexibility for developers but may not do enough to encourage water conservation without more specific direction on the most effective measures in different circumstances.

Full text:

We support this amendment on the basis that further advice on specific water efficiency measures will be given in a later DPD. The amendment provides more flexibility for developers but may not do enough to encourage water conservation without more specific direction on the most effective measures in different circumstances.

Support

Focused Amendments to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

FA18

Representation ID: 21251

Received: 19/06/2012

Respondent: Tunbridge Wells Borough Council

Representation Summary:

Part of Bewl Water sits within Tunbridge Wells Borough and this amendment will aid joint working between the two authorities to ensure that water-based recreation has due regard to environmental considerations.

Full text:

Part of Bewl Water sits within Tunbridge Wells Borough and this amendment will aid joint working between the two authorities to ensure that water-based recreation has due regard to environmental considerations.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.