Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Search representations

Results for Northiam Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

12.33

Representation ID: 20868

Received: 09/11/2011

Respondent: Northiam Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

We question the soundness of point 12.33 as According to SHLAA:-
ID NO22
Site Name - Goddens Gill Amenity Area
Rural Northiam/AONB - Ancient woodland and wet woodland 20M south from boundary
Reason for On-Site Constraints - Potential adverse impacts upon neighbouring amenities/play area

Full text:

We question the soundness of point 12.33 as According to SHLAA:-
ID NO22
Site Name - Goddens Gill Amenity Area
Rural Northiam/AONB - Ancient woodland and wet woodland 20M south from boundary
Reason for On-Site Constraints - Potential adverse impacts upon neighbouring amenities/play area

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

12.65

Representation ID: 20869

Received: 09/11/2011

Respondent: Northiam Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

We are concerned about the soundness of point 12.65 concerning the requirement that Farm Buildings requesting for residential use would have to be offered to social landlords for affordable housing for people with a local connection.

Full text:

We are concerned about the soundness of point 12.65 concerning the requirement that Farm Buildings requesting for residential use would have to be offered to social landlords for affordable housing for people with a local connection.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

12.2

Representation ID: 20870

Received: 09/11/2011

Respondent: Northiam Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Rural Economy
We are GREATLY concerned about the soundness of 12.22 which is going to be enforced to justify more housing in villages.

Full text:

Rural Economy
We are GREATLY concerned about the soundness of 12.22 which is going to be enforced to justify more housing in villages.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Policy RA1: Villages

Representation ID: 20871

Received: 09/11/2011

Respondent: Northiam Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

We take issue with the soundness of the policy RA1 concerning distribution of housing numbers in villages figure 12.
With all this criteria in mind we fail to see how Northiam has the second highest housing allocation of 100 dwellings, second only to Robertsbridge, who have:-

 A main road access (A21)
 A main line station
 Many shops, business and employment opportunities
 A well serviced public transport network

Full text:

We take issue with the soundness of the policy RA1 concerning distribution of housing numbers in villages figure 12.
With all this criteria in mind we fail to see how Northiam has the second highest housing allocation of 100 dwellings, second only to Robertsbridge, who have:-

 A main road access (A21)
 A main line station
 Many shops, business and employment opportunities
 A well serviced public transport network

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Policy RA2: General Strategy for the Countryside

Representation ID: 20873

Received: 09/11/2011

Respondent: Northiam Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

With reference to Northiam and the soundness of point 12.6
(iii) "To support sustainable local employment opportunities and economic viability of rural communities"

Full text:

With reference to Northiam and the soundness of point 12.6
(iii) "To support sustainable local employment opportunities and economic viability of rural communities"

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Policy RA2: General Strategy for the Countryside

Representation ID: 20874

Received: 09/11/2011

Respondent: Northiam Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

With reference to the soundness of reducing car movements in Northiam point 12.6

(vi) "To reduce both the need to travel and reliance on the private car, by promoting the use of public transport and supporting viable accessible service and facilities within villages"

Full text:

With reference to the soundness of reducing car movements in Northiam point 12.6

(vi) "To reduce both the need to travel and reliance on the private car, by promoting the use of public transport and supporting viable accessible service and facilities within villages"

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Policy RA2: General Strategy for the Countryside

Representation ID: 20875

Received: 09/11/2011

Respondent: Northiam Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

We object to the soundness of point 12.6
(vii) "To protect the open countryside and retain it intrinsic rural character for the benefit of residents and Visitors."
(ix) "To protect and conserve the historic landscape mosaic, particular in the High Weald AONB."

Full text:

We object to the soundness of point 12.6
(vii) "To protect the open countryside and retain it intrinsic rural character for the benefit of residents and Visitors."
(ix) "To protect and conserve the historic landscape mosaic, particular in the High Weald AONB."

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.