Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Search representations
Results for Cantelupe Community Association search
New searchObject
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Policy BX1: Overall Strategy for Bexhill
Representation ID: 20997
Received: 11/11/2011
Respondent: Cantelupe Community Association
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
BX1(ii) is unsound as it does not detail relevant local studies and national policies.
BX1(ii) is unsound as it does not detail relevant local studies and national policies.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Policy BX1: Overall Strategy for Bexhill
Representation ID: 21000
Received: 11/11/2011
Respondent: Cantelupe Community Association
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
In BX1(iv) as the area that this organisation is concerned with is recognised as a deprived area, it is critical that the impacts of development proposals are thoroughly researched and local consultation takes place. This is vital as the area is already densely flatted and welfare is a recognised concern.
In BX1(iv) as the area that this organisation is concerned with is recognised as a deprived area, it is critical that the impacts of development proposals are thoroughly researched and local consultation takes place. This is vital as the area is already densely flatted and welfare is a recognised concern.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Policy BX2: Bexhill Town Centre
Representation ID: 21004
Received: 11/11/2011
Respondent: Cantelupe Community Association
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
BX2(vi) is too vague as there are important buildings and places of public value (including open spaces) outside as well as inside the Conservation Area.
BX2(vi) is too vague as there are important buildings and places of public value (including open spaces) outside as well as inside the Conservation Area.
