Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Search representations
Results for AmicusHorizon Ltd (Rother Homes) search
New searchSupport
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 20 - Percentage of Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 19304
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: AmicusHorizon Ltd (Rother Homes)
There is an intrinsic risk, given the current market position, of a over zealous reliance on Developer led Section 106 Planning Gain schemes progressing.
The overall numbers of homes seems reasonable and achievable although the ratio of homes from S106 will be, in our opinion, lower than thouse mentioned.
There is an intrinsic risk, given the current market position, of a over zealous reliance on Developer led Section 106 Planning Gain schemes progressing.
The overall numbers of homes seems reasonable and achievable although the ratio of homes from S106 will be, in our opinion, lower than thouse mentioned.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 20 - Preferred Strategy for Housing
Representation ID: 19305
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: AmicusHorizon Ltd (Rother Homes)
We support the intention to maximise the number of affordable homes coming through the Planning system. That said there needs to be a degree of flexibility in both the percentage of affordable homes on specific sites as well as the tenures of said homes. We support the use of the term 'Intermediate' tenure and this does indeed allow other home ownership products to be utilised as and when required.
We support the intention to maximise the number of affordable homes coming through the Planning system. That said there needs to be a degree of flexibility in both the percentage of affordable homes on specific sites as well as the tenures of said homes. We support the use of the term 'Intermediate' tenure and this does indeed allow other home ownership products to be utilised as and when required.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Option b
Representation ID: 19306
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: AmicusHorizon Ltd (Rother Homes)
We support the option B in the paper, to have 35% in Bexhill, 40% Rye and Battle and 50% in Rural communities.
We support the option B in the paper, to have 35% in Bexhill, 40% Rye and Battle and 50% in Rural communities.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 20 - Type of Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 19307
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: AmicusHorizon Ltd (Rother Homes)
It is good to see the flexibility in the percentage figures of proposed affordable tenures. This, to a certain degree, will allows for market fluctuation and specific micro markets in certain areas
It is good to see the flexibility in the %age figures of proposed affordable tenures. This, to a certain degree, will allows for market fluctuation and specific micro markets in certain areas
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 20 - Allocations for Affordable Housing and Exception Sites
Representation ID: 19308
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: AmicusHorizon Ltd (Rother Homes)
support the status quo
support the status quo
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 20 - Housing mix, homelessness and Private Sector Housing Renewal
Representation ID: 19309
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: AmicusHorizon Ltd (Rother Homes)
The housing needs of Rother were last captured and published via the Housing Market Assessment in 2006, as with most HMA's we have been involved with, they are only as good as the last update they have had.
We have a concern that the social properties procured via Planning Gain will not necessarily meet the current needs of the Borough - the gestation period for a large S106 site is historically many years too which exacerbates this problem. The needs figures need regular updating.
The housing needs of Rother were last captured and published via the Housing Market Assessment in 2006, as with most HMA's we have been involved with, they are only as good as the last update they have had.
We have a concern that the social properties procured via Planning Gain will not necessarily meet the current needs of the Borough - the gestation period for a large S106 site is historically many years too which exacerbates this problem. The needs figures need regular updating.
