Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Search representations
Results for Sedlescombe Parish Council search
New searchObject
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 3 - Preferred Strategy for Overall Spatial Development
Representation ID: 19224
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
e) This statement is too vague and should specify the area(s) referred to. Sedlescombe Parish Council would not support any extension of the urban fringes of Hastings outwards from the Hastings boundary with Rother District to the south of Baldslow. Large-scale development has already taken place on the Hastings side of the boundary and the area between Baldslow and the parish of Sedlescombe along the A21 should be safeguarded as an important area of countryside. This is especially important now that the Sussex Coast Sub-Region has been identified which touches the boundary of Sedlescombe parish (fig.5, page 15).
e) This statement is too vague and should specify the area(s) referred to. Sedlescombe Parish Council would not support any extension of the urban fringes of Hastings outwards from the Hastings boundary with Rother District to the south of Baldslow. Large-scale development has already taken place on the Hastings side of the boundary and the area between Baldslow and the parish of Sedlescombe along the A21 should be safeguarded as an important area of countryside. This is especially important now that the Sussex Coast Sub-Region has been identified which touches the boundary of Sedlescombe parish (fig.5, page 15).
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 11 - Preferred Strategy for Hastings Fringes
Representation ID: 19225
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Preferred strategy for the Hastings fringes in Rother District.
Although there is more detail about the management of the Hastings urban fringes and in (iii) long-term countryside gaps between Hastings and Bexhill, Crowhurst, Battle and Fairlight are specified, the Hastings to Sedlescombe gap is not mentioned and some protection needs to be afforded to this gap.
Preferred strategy for the Hastings fringes in Rother District.
Although there is more detail about the management of the Hastings urban fringes and in (iii) long-term countryside gaps between Hastings and Bexhill, Crowhurst, Battle and Fairlight are specified, the Hastings to Sedlescombe gap is not mentioned and some protection needs to be afforded to this gap.
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 20 - Allocations for Affordable Housing and Exception Sites
Representation ID: 19226
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Sedlescombe Parish Council does not support the proposals in this section for the increase of affordable social housing in the countryside or villages. The Parish Council does not support use of rural exception sites outside the development boundary for the building of affordable social housing.
Sedlescombe currently has sufficient social housing (see box 18 above) but insufficient cheaper housing to buy. Sedlescombe has 12% social housing which it considers to be sufficient, particularly with the lack of employment in the area and lack of public transport.
c) Development in the countryside. The Parish Council does not support use of rural exception sites outside the development boundary for the building of affordable social housing. Sedlescombe has 12% social housing which it considers to be sufficient, particularly with the lack of employment in the area and lack of public transport.
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Option b
Representation ID: 19228
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Preferred Strategy for Housing. Sedlescombe Parish Council does not support the proposals in this section for the increase of affordable social housing in the countryside or villages. Sedlescombe currently has sufficient social housing but insufficient cheaper housing to buy.
Preferred Strategy for Housing. Sedlescombe Parish Council does not support the proposals in this section for the increase of affordable social housing in the countryside or villages. Sedlescombe currently has sufficient social housing (see box 18 above) but insufficient cheaper housing to buy.
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 20 - Threshold of Affordable Housing (rural areas)
Representation ID: 19229
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Sedlescombe Parish Council does not support the proposals in this section for the increase of affordable social housing in the countryside or villages. Sedlescombe currently has sufficient social housing (see box 18 above) but insufficient cheaper housing to buy.
Sedlescombe Parish Council does not support the proposals in this section for the increase of affordable social housing in the countryside or villages. Sedlescombe currently has sufficient social housing (see box 18 above) but insufficient cheaper housing to buy.
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 22 - Preferred Strategy for Gypsies and Travellers
Representation ID: 19232
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Because of previous problems experienced by local residents in this area, the Parish Council would not support the identification of land in Sedlescombe for a permanent or transit site.
Because of previous problems experienced by local residents in this area, the Parish Council would not support the identification of land in Sedlescombe for a permanent or transit site.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 23 - Preferred Strategy for Older People
Representation ID: 19233
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Sedlescombe Parish Council supports an innovative approach to looking after older people which will allow people as they grow older to remain, and if need be nursed, within in their own communities.
Sedlescombe Parish Council supports an innovative approach to looking after older people which will allow people as they grow older to remain, and if need be nursed, within in their own communities.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 26 - (c) For tourism
Representation ID: 19234
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Sedlescombe Parish Council supports the conversion of farm buildings for tourism.
Sedlescombe Parish Council supports the conversion of farm buildings for tourism.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 33 - Preferred Strategy for Flood Risk
Representation ID: 19235
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Every effort should be made not to allow development in the flood plain.
Every effort should be made not to all development in the flood plain.
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
13. Transport and Accessibility
Representation ID: 19236
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Sedlescombe Parish Council
Sedlescombe Parish Council would like to see encouragement of local lift schemes whereby volunteers help those in the community without, or unable to use, transport to access healthcare serves.
Sedlescombe Parish Council would like to see encouragement of local lift schemes whereby volunteers help those in the community without, or unable to use, transport to access healthcare serves.
