Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Search representations
Results for Musgrave Budgens Londis search
New searchObject
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 13 - Preferred Strategy Direction for Battle
Representation ID: 20065
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Musgrave Budgens Londis
Agent: GR Planning Consultancy Ltd.
Paragraph 7.40 and Box 13(e)(ii)
Object to 1,000sq.m. net of convenience (food) floorspace and policy not going further in confirming that this need can and should be met through the expansion of existing foodstore. Consider potential for at least 1,394sq.m net. No other potential sites. Expasnion of existing store is sustainable. Would increase footfall and linked trips within the centre and give it 'critical mass' to compete with larger foodstores elsewhere. Contrary to PPS6. Request wording 'subject to detailed site assessments' is deleted. Replace by a commitment to accommodating the projected need within the Market Place and through expansion of the store.
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Box 15 - Preferred Strategy for Rye and Rye Harbour
Representation ID: 20067
Received: 27/01/2009
Respondent: Musgrave Budgens Londis
Agent: GR Planning Consultancy Ltd.
Paragraph 8.34 + Box 15(e)(ii)
1,650 sq.m net of convenience floorspace to 2016 has not been justified, is based on a number of errors and inaccuracies and is a significant overestimation of potential future capacity for convenience floorspace in Rye and should be deleted.
Has not taken into consideration the current and future turnover of the store. Acceptability of providing the recommended scale of floorspace not justified in relation to PPS6 tests and Rye. No assessment of whether the continued expansion and enhancement of the foodstore could accommodate this need. Projections should not be regarded as targets. No assessment of sequential tests.