Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Search representations

Results for RSPB search

New search New search

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Water Supply and Wastewater Resource

Representation ID: 19752

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: RSPB

Representation Summary:

The Preferred Option for Water Policy and Waste Water
Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS) can not only reduce the amount of peak run off, but also have benefits to water quality, and amenity/biodiversity, and should be encouraged in the core strategy as a potential solution in reducing pollution loads to sensitive environmental receptors and aid groundwater recharge.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Box 33 - Preferred Strategy for Flood Risk

Representation ID: 19754

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: RSPB

Representation Summary:

Flood Risk
We would like to discourage any further development within flood zones as it is against national policy identified in PPS25. Any flood alleviation or mitigation works may affect the hydrological regime in sensitive downstream receptors like the Dungeness to Pett Level SPA, or Pevensey Levels Ramsar sites.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

13. Transport and Accessibility

Representation ID: 19757

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: RSPB

Representation Summary:

Transport
We have concerns about any new road schemes, which maybe in the proximity of Pevensey Levels Ramsar site or Dungeness to Pett Level SPA site, unless it can be shown that there will be no adverse effect on those sites.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.