Maps: District Key Diagram and Bexhill Inset Diagram
Support
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20743
Received: 28/09/2011
Respondent: Mars Pension Trustees Limited
Agent: Blue Sky Planning
Paragraph 8.38 concerns the potential for an expansion of Bexhill Town Centre in an edge of centre location to the north of the railway line. The text clarifies this in relation to Sea Road through to Terminus Road including the southern end of Beeching Road.
The Town Centre expansion of Map 2 shows an area of the north of the railway line, but this is not very well related to the area described in Paragraph 8.38. We consider that the Inset Map should be amended to better reflect the area described in paragraph 8.36.
Paragraph 8.38 concerns the potential for an expansion of Bexhill Town Centre in an edge of centre location to the north of the railway line. The text clarifies this in relation to Sea Road through to Terminus Road including the southern end of Beeching Road.
The Town Centre expansion of Map 2 shows an area of the north of the railway line, but this is not very well related to the area described in Paragraph 8.38. We consider that the Inset Map should be amended to better reflect the area described in paragraph 8.36.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21097
Received: 11/11/2011
Respondent: BALI
Agent: DMH Stallard
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Not Justified - The inclusion of a 'Potential Broad Location for Further Development west of the A259' is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base, as is fully explained in our submissions on Paragraph 8.59. It therefore should not be shown on this Inset Diagram.
Not Effective - This proposed Broad Location is not effective, as no evidence has been provided to demonstrate its delivery in the period of the Core Strategy. There is no certainty in the area being able to be accessed from a new 'development road'.
Not Consistent with National Policy - Both PPS 3 Housing and the Draft National Planning Policy Framework require that any Broad Locations for Development must be deliverable. No evidence is provided in this Core Strategy that the area west of the A259 is deliverable within the period of the Core Strategy.
Not Justified - The inclusion of a 'Potential Broad Location for Further Development west of the A259' is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base, as is fully explained in our submissions on Paragraph 8.59. It therefore should not be shown on this Inset Diagram.
Not Effective - This proposed Broad Location is not effective, as no evidence has been provided to demonstrate its delivery in the period of the Core Strategy. There is no certainty in the area being able to be accessed from a new 'development road'.
Not Consistent with National Policy - Both PPS 3 Housing and the Draft National Planning Policy Framework require that any Broad Locations for Development must be deliverable. No evidence is provided in this Core Strategy that the area west of the A259 is deliverable within the period of the Core Strategy.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21098
Received: 09/11/2011
Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The key diagram should show Ticehurst and Robertsbridge as Rural Service Centres suitable for housing and employment growth to clearly indicate their position as expanding villages in the future. Their function needs to be set apart from the smaller villages which have far less scope for sustainable growth.
The key diagram should show Ticehurst and Robertsbridge as Rural Service Centres suitable for housing and employment growth to clearly indicate their position as expanding villages in the future. Their function needs to be set apart from the smaller villages which have far less scope for sustainable growth.
Support
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21110
Received: 08/11/2011
Respondent: Glyndebourne 1991 L & P Trust
Agent: Strutt & Parker
Map 1: District Key Diagram
The inclusion of Robertsbridge as a village with development potential is strongly supported.
Map 1: District Key Diagram
The inclusion of Robertsbridge as a village with development potential is strongly supported.
Support
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21210
Received: 11/11/2011
Respondent: NCB Sussex Planning Activity
Inset Map for Bexhill shows land to the north of the town as 'Potential Broad Location for Further Development'.
Support is made for the vision for Rother, Policy BX3 - the development strategy for Bexhill and the Inset Map for Bexhill, showing land to the north of the town as a 'Potential Broad Location for Further Development'.