Infrastructure Capacity: Insufficient road capacity, poor access, inadequate parking and overwhelmed public services - electricity, water and mains gas.
Environmental Impact: Loss of protected habitats, hedgerow, medieval field patterns, biodiversity and green spaces.
Heritage and Landscape: Negative impact on Listed Buildings, Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
Local Amenity: Significant loss of privacy and increased noise, disturbance, and light pollution.
Disregard of warranties relating to lack of nuisance, damage and noise within Main Street Field held by four properties that lie on the Souther border of the field.
Alternative Sites: Evidence that other, more suitable sites are available as proposed elsewhere.

We object to the proposed allocation of land ID2, Main Street Field, for residential development in the Neighbourhood Plan. Our reasons relate to the disregard of Iden village being entirely within an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and part of the High Weald, the disregard of the environmental impact through the destruction of an ancient hedgerow and field pattern, the disregard of the poor amenities Iden has with frequent power and water cuts and no mains gas. There is disregard for the ancient setting of a number of heritage listed buildings in the immediate purview of the field. There is risk of danger through development of a busy main road which already has inadequate visibility. Finally the village is by choice ‘dark’, it has no street lighting, in order to preserve the skycape. Substantial residential development will no doubt require street lighting thus destroying the character of this Domesday village.

DRAFT LOCAL PLAN – SITE ID2
We wish to object to the inclusion of ten or more houses on the site in Main Street, Iden known as ID2.
Whilst we accept that, eventually, there may be some housing development on this site we object very strongly to the scale of the present proposal for the following reasons. Main Street, Iden is almost completely characterised by individual detached family houses, many with quite large gardens. This draft plan implies that there would probably be a solid row of 10 or more terraced, or otherwise linked properties, completely out of character with almost all the existing homes in the village neighbourhood. In addition, such a development would detract from the setting of numerous listed buildings, several of which are of considerable architectural interest and merit.
Please may we ask for this element of the Local Plan to be re-considered on the grounds that it currently represents a massive over-development of the land available in this particular village situation.
[personal details redacted]

I object to this proposal for site ID2.
Development should prioritise 'brownfield' sites such as the Morfeys site, rather than target agricultural land in a Domesday village located in a conservation area. Development must reflect the character of Iden, not detract from it.
The hedgerow of Street Field (alongside Main Steet) is higher than 6 ft/1.8m. This is to be retained, yet it would restrict visability to anyone exiting the proposed site. There are existing problems for anyone CAREFULLY exiting Playden Lane and Randolph Lane onto Main Street. This is due to restrictive sight lines and some vehicles travelling at inappropriate speeds along Main Street.
The current owners of Street Field initiated the sale of part of the land. They approached several owners of properties in Playden Lane, adjacent to Street Field. The sale completed in 2023.
Rother District Council should be aware a written statement (dated 1st December 2025) was submitted to Iden Parish Council. This statement advised the Council that the owners of the recently acquired land and the existing field owners have mutually binding Covenents; This states owners 'Will not do, permit or suffer anything upon the retained land which will cause damage,nuisance or annoyance to the property or the owners or occupiers thereof'.
It should be noted the owners of these new plots of land were recently approached by a property developer trying to get assistance to develop. They stated they could not proceed with any development due to these Covenents. We have declined their invitation to remove them from our Deeds.

I object to the proposed allocation ID2 - Land at Street Field, Iden.
1. Highways safety - hedgerow retention
The allocation requires the existing hedgerow along Main Street to be "retained and enhanced", only removing a short section. This appears impracticable, as its is a sizeable hedge and to ensure removal of the hedge so safe access cannot be achieved will require more than the removal of a shrt section of hedge. Therefore the allocation is genuinely undeliverable as drafted.
2. Heritage Impact
There are a number of Grade II listed buildings opposite or adjacent to the site, 5 at least. The Council must give special regard to preserving the setting of listed buidings, a surburban frontage development opposite these Grade II buildings is clearly not acceptable. The impact of this allocation on local heritage needs to be fully assessed before inclusion into the Plan.
3. This site lies within the High Weald National Landscape and due regard needs to be given conserving and enhancing the landscape and scenic beauty, urbanising the Main Street frontage and erosion of hedged enclosure is clearly at odds with this.
4. Deliverability
Part of the site is subject to a restrictive convenant. There is therefore a question of whether the site is genuinely available and the plans deliverable with the plan period.

Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.










Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.

















Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.


















IDEN PARISH COUNCIL
Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.

Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.










Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.

















Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.


















IDEN PARISH COUNCIL
Response to Site Allocation Consultation/Rother Local Plan 2025/2042
Background
Iden is a small Domesday village with 258 dwellings and a population of approx. 500 residents.
58 social housing dwellings built in 1960/70s but now at least half are owner occupied.
39 properties have grade 2 listed status- above average.
Planning policy has been to maintain the open spaces/agricultural fields and not permit ribbon development as Iden is in area of outstanding beauty.
For many years any new developments have had to be within a tightly drawn envelope.
This has resulted in:-
• Only 5 new properties built in past 55 years
• Many properties enlarged
• Above average inflation in property values and the perception that Iden is a desirable village to live, with shop/post office and other attractions ( playing field/bowls club/now shortly to be restored pub etc)
• As a result of above, demography has changed with increasing number of retired moving in replacing younger families and importantly what was once an artisan community.
• In recent years, Iden has lost its 3 football and one of the cricket teams, with the remainder composed entirely of non residents.
• Our modernised play area used mainly by visiting families
• The village has become increasingly vulnerable to properties being used as holiday lets and Airbnb
• Local Community groups being under resourced
The Parish Council has always acknowledged that there is a chronic need for new affordable housing in order to bring in younger families and to help restore a balanced community. This has meant looking beyond the existing development envelope by using a brown field site only half a mile from the village centre. However this “island Development” has consistently been rejected for the reasons of employment/isolation and possibility that this would open up the adjoining fields for building.

Because of the tight and inflexible development envelope, the Parish Council has not be persuaded to formulate a Neighbourhood Plan, particularly as Iden is such a relatively small village. However and importantly, the Council has consistently argued for the brownfield site to be considered which frustratingly has always been rejected.
There are also infrastructure issues, education and medical services that have always to be taken into account wherever new development is considered.

Current situation
Site IDI Land south of Elmsmead
Despite much opposition, including from the Parish Council, 15 new dwellings have been agreed and despite the affordability objective, the developers are now seeking this requirement to be removed.
The consultation for this site began in 2013 and permission only granted a few months ago. Although now subject to the afore mentioned request, considerable environmental conditions also need to be overcome.
Site ID2 Land at Street Field Main Street Iden
The Parish Council has carefully considered the proposal for 10 new dwellings on this site and taken due notice of public opinions.
Whilst it reiterates its wish for new affordable housing in the village, the Parish Council is opposed to the usage of this site for the following reasons:-
• This field has always been regarded as an important part of the outstanding natural beauty Iden has enjoyed and for this reason, an application for just a temporary unit was rejected in 2010
• Over development in an area where, in close proximity there will be the agreed 15 new dwellings referred to above ( Conkers)
• Also cluster of 5 Grade 2 listed buildings nearby
• With the probable need to improve road access and pedestrian access with increased traffic, the entire character of this historic part of Iden will be changed
• The policy to squeeze as much new builds into an already full development envelope by making very limited exceptions is a short term fix when the wider aim of affordable home ownership will remain an imperative
• Creeping development in this way is only going to exacerbate Iden’s housing problem
• There is no evidence that they will not become second homes or holiday lets. Interestingly, since 2020, there are now 10 more airbnb’s in the village and RDC is wanting to build 10 new homes!
• The village does not want street lighting which will probably be a condition if these 10 houses are built. We value our dark skies.
• Iden lies within the High Weald National Landscape where national policy gives extra weight to conserving landscape character. This site does not conform to this standard
• The Council does not believe that due consideration has been given to the alternative sites offered by landowners and it appears Street Field is an easier option.
• Importantly the Council has always supported a new housing development at the brown field site referred to above and whilst conditions have changed, Planning appear to retain closed minds.

Parish Council proposals
For 15 years at least, the Council has asked that the brown field site known as Orchards Farm, Wittersham Road Iden TN31 7XB be brought within the village envelope This large area has become rather dilapidated in recent years and was the subject of a planning application for 17 dwellings in 2011 which was rejected as not part of the development envelope, and that it would create an “island” site leaving the open spaces alongside vulnerable to development. Employment was also a factor
The village has always supported this site as ideal for a development of say 15 dwellings and small business units to replace the existing ones. Morfeys Removers use this site as a depot but also have a larger unit at Rye Harbour
We are of the view that a detailed study of this site should be undertaken as a viable alternative to Street Field and avoid the stretching of the existing village envelope as proposed. It would also avoid ribbon development and would be away from facing the road.
The Parish Council’s vision is that we have a community that consists of all generations with affordable housing that is being built for this purpose. Our hope that this will revitalise village life and activities. We do not want dwellings that could be let for short term purposes or homes for the retired

It is unacceptable for developers to plead they cannot afford to build low cost homes despite stated policy.
Our proposals match our expectations and importantly do not harm this village’s exceptional heritage and respect the ancient Domesday village.

It is disappointing that the Parish Council was not formally consulted on these proposals before they were put out into the public domain. The Council wishes to remain proactive in how it views new developments in the village and be able to respond to what its residents want.
However, this consultation process appears to be a something that is merely going through a pre determined exercise and before anything further is decided, the Parish Council would like to meet with representatives from the Planning Department It is important that the Council can work constructively with the decision makers.

Please find enclosed my Objection to the Draft Local Plan proposal for ID2.

1. Street Field is a single piece of agricultural land abutting Main Street Iden of approximately 0.69 hectares. It is a gently sloping, open field at the southern end of the village, forming part of a wider fieldscape which extends into open countryside to the east. It is bordered by short terraces of cottages, including several grade II listed buildings on its south-eastern and south-western boundaries.It has a substantial roadside hedge on its boundary with Main Street and a field access.

2. A part of Street Field - the portion of land IDE0010 [which we now describe as Street Field West]- has been identified by Rother District Council as 'suitable for a short terrace of small houses fronting Main Street (10 in total), which would continue the adjoining ribbon development northwards'.

3. For many years, Iden Parish Council has submitted local plans to Rother District Council which specifically rule out any development of the agricultural land East of Main Street, because there has been a strong desire for Iden to remain one of those increasingly rare villages that retains its rural heritage. Although we accept that development policy can (and sometimes must) change to reflect new housing priorities, the Iden Parish Council position has been strongly supported inthe past by Rother District Council, for example in the RDC Development and Site Allocation Local Plan dated 16 December 2019 (DaSa). In this document it is stated as follows:
There is very limited scope for development in and around the village [Iden]. There is little opportunity for infill within the development boundary. Development east of the village, where extensive views may be gained across the countryside, would encroach negatively into the wider AONB landscape (Similarly) development to the south would inappropriately extend growth along Main Street, encroaching into an area of rural character [11.133].

4. We broadly support the government's intention to accelerate the building of new houses across the country, in particular the building of 'affordable houses'. This is an admirable policy. But we do have serious concerns where (as is the case here) new housing development is proposed without any, or any sufficient provision of the necessary infrastructure (local job opportunities, medical and education facilities, public transport, energy provision and so on) that are essential to make sense of and therefore to justify the proposed development.

4. The HELAA document IDEOO21 which preceded the current proposal stated as follows. The western part of the field [Street Field West] is assessed separately as IDE0010. While this separate section could potentially be suitable for a short terrace of small houses fronting Main Street, development into the remainder of the field would not be appropriate as this would be out of keeping with and harmful to the settlement pattern and the rural setting of the village within the countryside of the National Landscape, and could harm the setting of the adjacent listed buildings.

5. Having explained with solid reasoning why Street Field is generally unsuitable for development, the document reaches the opposite conclusion regarding the western portion of the field. Street Field West. This approach reads as disingenuous and inherently contradictory.
IDEOO10: The site forms the western section of a gently sloping open field at the southern end of thevillage,forming part of a wider fieldscape which extends into open countryside to the east. It is bordered by a short terrace of cottages, including grade II listed buildings, on its southern boundary. It has a substantial roadside hedge on its boundary with Main Street and a field access. The site could be suitable for a short terrace of small houses fronting Main Street, which would continue the adjoining ribbon development northwards. This is subject to the retention of as much of the roadside hedge as possible, allowing for an access and footway. Any development would need to be of an appropriate high quality design in order to respect the setting of adjacent listed buildings and the rural setting of the village within the High Weald National Landscape. Initial Highway Authority comments suggest that sightlines would need to be increased by the cutting back of vegetation, and a footway provided outside the site.

6. Observations:
• Iden is a small village of c. 450 residents,situated in an area of outstanding natural beauty adjoining/near Romney Marsh. It has many Grade II listed properties clustered around the proposed development site, of which several date back to the 16th century. Listed building property owners are legally bound to maintain the status of these buildings, which form part of the character of the area. Owners are prevented from altering or extending any part of these listed buildings unless fully compliant with stringent planning requirements, which have been designed to maintain the vernacular appearance and historic character of the area in which they are situated. It would be perverse and counter intuitive for the Rother District Council to support this proposed 'ribbon housing extension' in the centre of this cluster of listed buildings, a development that would most likely alter the character of the village for ever. Visitors regularly comment on the wonderful experience of arriving at Iden from the more urbanised settlements at Playden, Rye Foreign and Peasmarsh. They feel they have entered a rural gem where one can stop at the gate entrance to Street Field to admire the scene of grazing sheep with lambs etc. Rother District Council reflects this observation at 11.129 to 11.131 of the DaSa [see supra para. 3].
• IDEOO10 suggests that this potential site 'could be suitable for a short terrace of 10 small houses fronting Main Street, which would continue the adjoining ribbon development northward'. This so-called 'ribbon development' is in fact a cluster of four charming 1850s cottages, quite unsuitable to be annexed to any modern 'ribbon development'. Suggesting the roadside hedge 'should be retained as much as possible' is a fantasy. This ancient hedge would disappear under a footway which itself would abut a busy and relatively narrow highway.
• Iden is part of the HELAA Eastern Developments Cluster of 12 communities, all of which rely heavily on Rye for schools and medical support. At present, although the Medical Centre provides excellent care, such is existing demand that routine GP appointments are offered one month ahead, which many people feel is unacceptable. The proposed new site will only increase this problem and offers no collateral solution.
• Iden has no mains gas. The existing houses rely either on oil, wood burning stoves or expensive electric alternatives. There are no sustainable inexpensive alternatives yet available to the public in Britain, other than air source heat pumps. The HELAA proposal does not address this issue in any coherent way. The increased pressure on fragile water supplies and sewage disposal systems that the proposed development would inevitably generate, is also not accounted for in the proposal.
• There is already a considerable amount of through traffic frequently flouting the speed limits in Main St, Iden. The proposed new development abutting Main St would inevitably lead to a significant increase in motor traffic with concomitant danger to life, and further environmental destruction occasioned by the arrival of c. 20 more residential motor vehicles,increased pressure generally on limited parking options, an increase in local delivery vehicles and so on.
• Iden has a strong public commitment to maintaining its status as a Dark Sky Area which helps enhance its special rural qualities. The amount of lighting associated with any such development on Street Field West would completely undermine and effectively bring to an end this commitment.