Comment

Representation ID: 26682

Received: 29/07/2024

Respondent: Stephen Nicholls

First sentence wording needs to be revised from :- ” In addi􀆟on to this, no PROW should be removed
and a development should only seek to directly alter a PRoW, if there is an overriding benefit in doing
so.” Should read. “In addi􀆟on to this, no PRoW should be removed and a development should only
seek to directly alter a PRoW, if there is an overriding benefit to the PRoW in doing so.”

Comment

Representation ID: 28162

Received: 22/07/2024

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

The plan recognises the ageing population in Rother, therefore it is suggested it should
21
acknowledge the more complicated conditions they may experience, for example
chronic disease and fall-related injuries, by the inclusion of the suggested text within Paragraph 6.4:

‘The 2021 census also highlights that Rother has an ageing population, with a median age of 53 (the second highest in England and three higher than 2011), far older than the English median of 40, *this comes with an increase in complicated conditions associated with this group of people*.’