Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 25356
Received: 13/07/2024
Respondent: Catherine Isbell
While the effect on pedestrians and cyclists should be considered, it should also be noted that on-street parking is problematic for cyclists who would only benefit from the cars being able to be parked away from the road. Where access is onto a road with high speeds, the first consideration should be to lower the speed on the road, not to prevent residents from turning onto it.
While the effect on pedestrians and cyclists should be considered, it should also be noted that on-street parking is problematic for cyclists who would only benefit from the cars being able to be parked away from the road. Where access is onto a road with high speeds, the first consideration should be to lower the speed on the road, not to prevent residents from turning onto it.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 26379
Received: 17/07/2024
Respondent: Burwash Parish Council
Differentiation between agriculture track / access for definite need as opposed to random access tracks promoting dispelling of medieval filed structures and harming of the Natural landscape.
Please see attached comments from Burwash Parish Council.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 27155
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: Westfield Parish Council
See point 212 in the attached submission.
Please see attached document for the full submission from Westfield Parish Council.
Comment
Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 28111
Received: 22/07/2024
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
HOU19: Access and Drives, iii), p313; This policy point should make specific reference to betterment in highway safety, therefore it is suggested that the wording should be revised to say ‘....of an existing access, if there *is clear highway betterment in terms of safety for* relocating the existing access.....’
HOU19: Access and Drives, p313; A policy point should be added to reflect that the creation of second accesses to the same dwelling to provide in - out drives will be strongly resisted unless it is demonstrated that there is a need for highway safety reasons.
HOU19: Access and Drives, p313; A policy point should be added to ensure that new drives and accesses onto a classified road will require sufficient in-curtilage turning provision for the parking accommodated so that each vehicle can enter and exit in a forward gear.
HOU19: Access and Drives, p313; A policy point should be added to reflect that loose driveway surface treatment cannot be supported as it can be dragged out into the footway and carriageway posing highway safety risk to vulnerable users such as motorcycles and cycles
Please see attached submitted document for full comments.