Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

Representation ID: 25712

Received: 21/07/2024

Respondent: Sussex Wildlife Trust

Representation Summary:

SWT supports this policy and particularly the requirement to deliver BNG within the park. The park is a valuable recreational resource to local communities and holds some very important places for wildlife that need to be protected and enhanced. In particular, the Countryside Park contains the Combe Haven SSSI which includes Sussex Wildlife Trust’s reserve Filsham Reedbed, the park also connects down through Glyne Gap LWS to the Bulverhythe Shingle Beach and Cliffs LWS.

Full text:

SWT supports this policy and particularly the requirement to deliver BNG within the park. The park is a valuable recreational resource to local communities and holds some very important places for wildlife that need to be protected and enhanced. In particular, the Countryside Park contains the Combe Haven SSSI which includes Sussex Wildlife Trust’s reserve Filsham Reedbed, the park also connects down through Glyne Gap LWS to the Bulverhythe Shingle Beach and Cliffs LWS.

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

Representation ID: 25928

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Southern Water

Representation Summary:

Southern Water understands the desire to protect habitats and sites of local importance. However, we are concerned that the current wording of this policy may create a barrier to statutory utility providers, such as Southern Water, from delivering essential infrastructure required to serve existing and planned development. We therefore request the following wording change to HWB7:

(i) Are small in scale and supported by the CVCP Community Interest Company and its strategy for the Park, other than in exceptional circumstances, for example where a proposal relates to necessary utilities infrastructure and where no reasonable alternative location is available.”

Southern Water considers that should the need arise, 'special circumstances' (NPPF, 2023, paragraphs 152, 153 & 155) exist in relation to the provision of essential wastewater infrastructure required to serve new and existing customers.

Full text:

Southern Water understands the desire to protect habitats and sites of local importance. However, we are concerned that the current wording of this policy may create a barrier to statutory utility providers, such as Southern Water, from delivering essential infrastructure required to serve existing and planned development. We therefore request the following wording change to HWB7, explaining our reasoning further below.

Requested changes:
(i) Are small in scale and supported by the CVCP Community Interest Company and its strategy for the Park, other than in exceptional circumstances, for example where a proposal relates to necessary utilities infrastructure and where no reasonable alternative location is available.”

Further explanation and justification:
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (2023) sets out the intention to protect the countryside, for which it establishes:

• The intention in paragraph 152 of ruling out inappropriate development ‘except in very special circumstances’.
• In paragraph 153 that special circumstances exist if the potential harm of a development proposal is clearly outweighed by other considerations.
• In paragraph 155 that 'certain other forms of development are also not inappropriate' including 'engineering operations'.

Southern Water considers that should the need arise, special circumstances exist in relation to the provision of essential wastewater infrastructure required to serve new and existing customers. This is because there can be limited options available with regard to location, as the infrastructure would need to connect into existing networks. The National Planning Practice Guidance (ref: 34-002-20140306) recognises this scenario and states that ‘it will be important to recognise that water and wastewater infrastructure sometimes has particular locational needs (and often consists of engineering works rather than new buildings) which mean otherwise protected areas may exceptionally have to be considered'.

Planning policies should therefore support proposals that come forward to deliver necessary water supply and wastewater infrastructure.

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

Representation ID: 26330

Received: 17/07/2024

Respondent: Burwash Parish Council

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

Please see attached comments from Burwash Parish Council.

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

Representation ID: 26455

Received: 22/07/2024

Respondent: Bexhill Heritage

Representation Summary:

5.5 HWB7: Combe Valley Countryside Park (CVCP)
Part of CVCP is privately owned. Can the Council agree that any future planning applications for residential new development within CVCP should be refused?

Full text:

Please refer to attachment

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

Representation ID: 27198

Received: 23/07/2024

Respondent: Friends of Combe Valley

Representation Summary:

We welcome the Overall Priority 1 - Green to the Core and the Proposed Policy HWB7: Combe Valley Countryside Park. However it is unfortunate that the Park is not referenced by name in the Proposed Policy DEV6: Strategic Green Gaps, where it is referred to as Bexhill and Hastings/St Leonards Strategic Green Gap. The park is clearly important as part of the policy relating to health and well being, but it also needs to be emphasised that it is land which is protected from development as part of the strategic green gap between Bexhill and St Leonards

Full text:

We welcome the Overall Priority 1 - Green to the Core and the Proposed Policy HWB7: Combe Valley Countryside Park. However it is unfortunate that the Park is not referenced by name in the Proposed Policy DEV6: Strategic Green Gaps, where it is referred to as Bexhill and Hastings/St Leonards Strategic Green Gap. The park is clearly important as part of the policy relating to health and well being, but it also needs to be emphasised that it is land which is protected from development as part of the strategic green gap between Bexhill and St Leonards

Comment

Rother Local Plan 2020-2040 (Regulation 18)

Representation ID: 28093

Received: 22/07/2024

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

HWB7: Combe Valley Countryside Park, p218 – 220; Access to the Countryside Park should be considered especially improved access by walking, cycling, wheeling and public transport (bus).

Full text:

Please see attached submitted document for full comments.

Attachments: