11.110

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Object

Proposed Submission Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan

Representation ID: 24279

Received: 07/12/2018

Respondent: East Field Action Group

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The development boundary excludes this site, I think you mean intended changes to the development boundary.

The justification for doing so is seriously flawed, as per my earlier sub. missions, 11. 101-11.107 no need to repeat.

The consultation process was not duly followed, there is NO proven demand from the locality for additional housing.

Full text:

The development boundary excludes this site, I think you mean intended changes to the development boundary.

The justification for doing so is seriously flawed, as per my earlier submissions, 11. 101-11.107 no need to repeat.

The consultation process was not duly followed, there is NO proven demand from the locality for additional housing.