11.110
Object
Proposed Submission Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan
Representation ID: 24279
Received: 07/12/2018
Respondent: East Field Action Group
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The development boundary excludes this site, I think you mean intended changes to the development boundary.
The justification for doing so is seriously flawed, as per my earlier sub. missions, 11. 101-11.107 no need to repeat.
The consultation process was not duly followed, there is NO proven demand from the locality for additional housing.
The development boundary excludes this site, I think you mean intended changes to the development boundary.
The justification for doing so is seriously flawed, as per my earlier submissions, 11. 101-11.107 no need to repeat.
The consultation process was not duly followed, there is NO proven demand from the locality for additional housing.