QUESTION 99: Do you agree with the recommendation to remove the development boundary at Pett Level? If not, please explain how you wish the development boundary to be applied to this settlement?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 23682

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Archaeology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Pett Level

Yes

Full text:

Archaeology

Please note that for most answers in this section a Red, Amber or Green rating has been assigned. In providing these responses, regard has been had to paragraph 169 of the NPPF. We are of the view that in order to satisfy this part of the NPPF, some of the proposed site allocations should be subject to archaeological assessment prior to the Pre-Submission version of the DaSA being published - these particular sites are identified below. For all the proposed allocations there will be a requirement for the subsequent planning applications to satisfy paragraph 128 of the NPPF

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Pett Level

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 23767

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Full text:

Ecology

OTHER VILLAGES WITH DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARIES IN 2006 LOCAL PLAN Page 317

Yes

Comment

Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options

Representation ID: 23940

Received: 20/02/2017

Respondent: East Sussex County Council

Representation Summary:

Flood Risk Management

Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317

We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.

Full text:

Flood Risk Management

Section 16 Other Villages with Development Boundaries in the 2006 Local Plan p317

We support the review of development boundaries in light of environmental constraints and risks and their removal where it is considered appropriate on sustainability grounds.