QUESTION 45: Do you agree with the requirements of Policy BEX16, including the proposed district shopping centre boundaries as defined in Figures 51 and 52? If not, how would you wish to see it amende
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22033
Received: 04/01/2017
Respondent: Mr Charles Coombes
Do not agree for Little Common. It is NOT thriving as stated. The main functions are Estate Agents, bathroom and kitchen improvements, hair salons and cafes.
If it was thriving the old Coop would not have stood empty for almost a year.
No comment on Sidley.
Do not agree for Little Common. It is NOT thriving as stated. The main functions are Estate Agents, bathroom and kitchen improvements, hair salons and cafes.
If it was thriving the old Coop would not have stood empty for almost a year.
No comment on Sidley.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 22299
Received: 15/02/2017
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Burnett
Suggest small local shops and specialist shops for these smaller centres. More parking provision as that is the primary cause of people deserting small areas in favour of major out-of-town stores. Better bus services would probably assist at shorter intervals, possibly smaller buses? Lower business rates of tax to Council may be useful?
Suggest small local shops and specialist shops for these smaller centres. More parking provision as that is the primary cause of people deserting small areas in favour of major out-of-town stores. Better bus services would probably assist at shorter intervals, possibly smaller buses? Lower business rates of tax to Council may be useful?
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 23506
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Transport Strategy & Economic Development
BEXHILL Page 128
Policy BEX16: Little Common and Sidley District Centres
Agree with policy BEX14, but it is suggested that this is linked to the need to support improvements to maximise local accessibility and greater transport choices. Measures to support this within the Little Common area were identified within a recent Bexhill & Hastings Movement & Access Study undertaken by the County Council.
Transport Strategy & Economic Development
BEXHILL Page 128
Policy BEX16: Little Common and Sidley District Centres
Agree with policy BEX14, but it is suggested that this is linked to the need to support improvements to maximise local accessibility and greater transport choices. Measures to support this within the Little Common area were identified within a recent Bexhill & Hastings Movement & Access Study undertaken by the County Council.
Comment
Development and Site Allocations (DaSA) Local Plan - Options and Preferred Options
Representation ID: 23727
Received: 20/02/2017
Respondent: East Sussex County Council
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
Yes
Ecology
BEXHILL Page 128
Yes