12.38

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20737

Received: 28/10/2011

Respondent: Royal Court Developments Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

My objection is two-fold:
1. I do not believe it is necessary to have a range of housing requirements for each village in Figure 12.
2. I believe the figures should be described as "up to" a certain level and for that level to be tested at the Site Allocation Stage in terms of the availability of further information in viability and sustainability factors.
3. I believe the Ticehurst housing figures are low.

Full text:

My objection is two-fold:
1. I do not believe it is necessary to have a range of housing requirements for each village in Figure 12.
2. I believe the figures should be described as "up to" a certain level and for that level to be tested at the Site Allocation Stage in terms of the availability of further information in viability and sustainability factors.
3. I believe the Ticehurst housing figures are low.