Figure 10: Villages Demonstrating a Particular Need for Employment Floorspace
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20538
Received: 24/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The proportion of additional employment space should be in accordance with a Settlement Sustainable Hierarchy with agreater provision given to the settlement that is the most sustainable eg Robertsbridge.
The proportion of additional employment space should be in accordance with a Settlement Sustainable Hierarchy with agreater provision given to the settlement that is the most sustainable eg Robertsbridge.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20566
Received: 21/09/2011
Respondent: Croudace Strategic Ltd
Agent: Portchester Planning Consultancy
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Paragraph 12.24 and Figure 10 are objected to.
The Table in the figure should be sub-divided into 2 parts.
Firstly the 2 Rural Service Centres and secondly the remaining villages.
It is important to draw this distinction as the majority of the employment floorspace should be concentrated in the Rural Service Centres as being the most sustainable locations, in accordance with the approach set out in Policy EC6.2 of PPS4.
Paragraph 12.24 and Figure 10 are objected to.
The Table in the figure should be sub-divided into 2 parts.
Firstly the 2 Rural Service Centres and secondly the remaining villages.
It is important to draw this distinction as the majority of the employment floorspace should be concentrated in the Rural Service Centres as being the most sustainable locations, in accordance with the approach set out in Policy EC6.2 of PPS4.