Policy OSS4: Location of development

Showing comments and forms 1 to 10 of 10

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20532

Received: 23/08/2011

Respondent: Devine Homes

Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Point iii: Meet housing market demand in accordence the Strategic Market Housing Assessment, include appropriate dwelling types, tenure and mix. Meet the housing needs of the district over the plan period.

Point vi: assess the character and qualities of the landscape against the economic and social needs of the district and region as a whole.

Full text:

Point iii: Meet housing market demand in accordence the Strategic Market Housing Assessment, include appropriate dwelling types, tenure and mix. Meet the housing needs of the district over the plan period.

Point vi: assess the character and qualities of the landscape against the economic and social needs of the district and region as a whole.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20643

Received: 30/09/2011

Respondent: J J BANISTER

Agent: Mr NICK IDE

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this part of the policy redundant.

Full text:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this part of the policy redundant.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20656

Received: 30/09/2011

Respondent: Mr. R.T. Caine

Agent: Mr NICK IDE

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.

Full text:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20669

Received: 30/09/2011

Respondent: J BLOCK

Agent: Mr NICK IDE

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.

Full text:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20682

Received: 30/09/2011

Respondent: J MITCHELL

Agent: Mr NICK IDE

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.

Full text:

If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20695

Received: 30/09/2011

Respondent: A AINSLIE

Agent: Mr NICK IDE

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this part of the policy redundant.

Full text:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this part of the policy redundant.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20710

Received: 30/09/2011

Respondent: TOM SACKVILLE

Agent: Mr NICK IDE

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.

Full text:

* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.

Support

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20724

Received: 24/10/2011

Respondent: Shepway District Council

Representation Summary:

Shepway District Council supports the objectives of this policy.

Full text:

Shepway District Council supports the objectives of this policy.

Object

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 20963

Received: 09/11/2011

Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policy OSS4 needs to be more precise with regards to the criteria as set out. There is a need for future development to be in a sustainable location and therefore the policy should include a criteria including a reference to the need for close proximity to local service. This is especially the case for villages.

Full text:

Policy OSS4 needs to be more precise with regards to the criteria as set out. There is a need for future development to be in a sustainable location and therefore the policy should include a criteria including a reference to the need for close proximity to local service. This is especially the case for villages.

Support

Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 21030

Received: 11/11/2011

Respondent: Rother and Hastings CPRE

Representation Summary:

CPRE Sussex welcomes and strongly supports criterion (vi) in Policy OSS4 on the location of development:

(vi) the character and qualities of the landscape

Full text:

CPRE Sussex welcomes and strongly supports criterion (vi) in Policy OSS4 on the location of development:

(vi) the character and qualities of the landscape