Policy OSS4: Location of development
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20532
Received: 23/08/2011
Respondent: Devine Homes
Agent: Courtley Consultants Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Point iii: Meet housing market demand in accordence the Strategic Market Housing Assessment, include appropriate dwelling types, tenure and mix. Meet the housing needs of the district over the plan period.
Point vi: assess the character and qualities of the landscape against the economic and social needs of the district and region as a whole.
Point iii: Meet housing market demand in accordence the Strategic Market Housing Assessment, include appropriate dwelling types, tenure and mix. Meet the housing needs of the district over the plan period.
Point vi: assess the character and qualities of the landscape against the economic and social needs of the district and region as a whole.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20643
Received: 30/09/2011
Respondent: J J BANISTER
Agent: Mr NICK IDE
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this part of the policy redundant.
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this part of the policy redundant.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20656
Received: 30/09/2011
Respondent: Mr. R.T. Caine
Agent: Mr NICK IDE
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20669
Received: 30/09/2011
Respondent: J BLOCK
Agent: Mr NICK IDE
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20682
Received: 30/09/2011
Respondent: J MITCHELL
Agent: Mr NICK IDE
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.
If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20695
Received: 30/09/2011
Respondent: A AINSLIE
Agent: Mr NICK IDE
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this part of the policy redundant.
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this part of the policy redundant.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20710
Received: 30/09/2011
Respondent: TOM SACKVILLE
Agent: Mr NICK IDE
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.
* If the Plan is found sound, then the locations proposed for development will have been found to have been suitable, making this element of the policy redundant.
Support
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20724
Received: 24/10/2011
Respondent: Shepway District Council
Shepway District Council supports the objectives of this policy.
Shepway District Council supports the objectives of this policy.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 20963
Received: 09/11/2011
Respondent: Strategic Land Kent Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Policy OSS4 needs to be more precise with regards to the criteria as set out. There is a need for future development to be in a sustainable location and therefore the policy should include a criteria including a reference to the need for close proximity to local service. This is especially the case for villages.
Policy OSS4 needs to be more precise with regards to the criteria as set out. There is a need for future development to be in a sustainable location and therefore the policy should include a criteria including a reference to the need for close proximity to local service. This is especially the case for villages.
Support
Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21030
Received: 11/11/2011
Respondent: Rother and Hastings CPRE
CPRE Sussex welcomes and strongly supports criterion (vi) in Policy OSS4 on the location of development:
(vi) the character and qualities of the landscape
CPRE Sussex welcomes and strongly supports criterion (vi) in Policy OSS4 on the location of development:
(vi) the character and qualities of the landscape