Box 31 - Preferred Strategy for Sustainable Resource Management (Option 2)
Object
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Representation ID: 19265
Received: 30/01/2009
Respondent: Aroncorp Ltd
Agent: Broadlands
No decisions should be taken on these options without full consultation on the outcome of the work still to be undertaken on this issue within the District and sub-region referred to in paragraph 12.32 i.e. the Strategy should not be "led by the outcomes of the formal consultation process" when the outcome of the work referred to is unknown.
No decisions should be taken on these options without full consultation on the outcome of the work still to be undertaken on this issue within the District and sub-region referred to in paragraph 12.32 i.e. the Strategy should not be "led by the outcomes of the formal consultation process" when the outcome of the work referred to is unknown.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Representation ID: 19396
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Rother Environmental Group
We strongly support the Option 2 (iii) to require a minimum of 10% of on-site renewable energy generation as above.
Energy deserves a Box of its own and we would commend
the example of Tunbridge Wells who have produced a SPD on renewable energy
Comment
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Representation ID: 19397
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: Rother Environmental Group
We support Option 2 (ii) for Code 4 by 2010 but not that it should be restricted to identified development areas. This requirement should be met by all new development and major refurbishments.
We support Option 2 (iv) but there is no need for the comment regarding sub regional joint working. It is appropriate for individual communities to seek ways of generating their own energy on their own.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Representation ID: 19721
Received: 02/03/2009
Respondent: Messrs. Chishick, Commotto and Terry
We support Option 2 for the strategy for Sustainable Resource Management.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Representation ID: 20013
Received: 28/01/2009
Respondent: Ewhurst Parish Council
Support option 2. The Core Strategy should impose sustainable development targets for any new house construction targets beyond the Government minimum.
Support
Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008
Representation ID: 20302
Received: 29/01/2009
Respondent: SEEDA
SEEDA supports the more ambitious option 2 within Box 31 to go beyond the Government's targets for sustainable design and construction, in particular we support the use of CHP for sites allocated for neighbourhood extensions.