Box 28 - Preferred Strategy for Landscape Stewardship

Showing comments and forms 1 to 16 of 16

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19107

Received: 28/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Bull

Agent: HLL Humberts Leisure

Representation Summary:

The Landscape Stewardship policy needs to reflect the role of recreational land uses, including more compatible forms of tourist accommodation, in maintaining and protecting the District's nationally designated and locally distinctive landscapes.

Full text:

We support paragraph 12.13, which recognises the role of recreational land uses in creating awareness of landscape management issues.

However, this recognition has not been reflected in the policy wording. The policy in Box 28 needs to reflect this recognition in paragraph 12.13 explicitly. It should acknowledge the role of existing recreational uses in maintaining and enhancing the character of the landscape. The protected landscapes of Rother are 'living landscapes', supporting livelihoods and generating vital revenue for rural areas.

It is recommended the policy wording is amended to read:

"This will be achieved by ensuring the protection and, wherever possible enhancement, of the District's nationally designated and locally distinctive landscapes for the benefit of all, whilst acknowledging the role of recreational land uses in their maintainence and protection."

Recreational land uses help to maintain and protect not just the wider countryside but also sensitive landscapes such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Paragraph 21 of PPS7 acknowledges that although the conservation of natural beauty should be given great weight in development control decisions in AONBs, local authorities should also "support suitably located and designed development necessary to facilitate the economic and social well-being of these designated areas and their communities...".

Furthermore, paragraph 34 (ii) of PPS7 acknowledges that there is scope for tourist and leisure related developments in areas statutorily designated for their landscape, nature conservation or historic qualities. To this end, the provision of suitable tourist accommodation in the AONB and other protected landscapes should be looked upon favourably. Holiday lodges provide a modern alternative to traditional static and touring caravans, being less visually intrusive and more in harmony with a countryside location. The contribution of appropriate tourist accommodation, such as holiday lodges, in protecting and enhancing sensitive landscapes, should be acknowledged by this policy.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19132

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Councillor David Vereker

Representation Summary:

Environment - Landscape Strategy:- Include tree planting.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19169

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

I would support the desire to protect and enhance the distinctive landscape and environment of the district. The area around Rye is one of open spaces and undeveloped coast. I wonder how this fits with the SE Plan 'Sussex Coast' sub-region plan which is to encourage development? Surely this particular coastal area should be excluded from the plan.

Full text:

I would support the desire to protect and enhance the distinctive landscape and environment of the district. The area around Rye is one of open spaces and undeveloped coast. I wonder how this fits with the SE Plan 'Sussex Coast' sub-region plan which is to encourage development? Surely this particular coastal area should be excluded from the plan.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19287

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Ian Dunlop

Representation Summary:

If this really means rigorous protection of the AONB and the villages within it ,as well as the woodland and surrounding countryside, then I approve wholeheartedly.
Reality however seems different. I watch as ribbon development between Sedlescombe and Cripps corner is steadily destroying the countryside between these two villages.

Full text:

If this really means rigorous protection of the AONB and the villages within it ,as well as the woodland and surrounding countryside, then I approve wholeheartedly.
Reality however seems different.I watch as ribbon dvelopment between Sedlescombe and Cripps corner is steadily destroying the countryside between these two villages.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19299

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Wealden District Council

Representation Summary:

Support for the preferred strategy for Landscape Stewardship and in particular for the protection and enhancement of the distinctive identified landscape character, ecological features and settlement pattern of the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Full text:

Support for the preferred strategy for Landscape Stewardship and in particular for the protection and enhancement of the distinctive identified landscape character, ecological features and settlement pattern of the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19364

Received: 16/02/2009

Respondent: Natural England

Agent: Natural England

Representation Summary:

Natural England commends the Council for putting forward a strategy to protect and enhance the districts environmental assets (i to ix)


Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19372

Received: 17/02/2009

Respondent: Natural England

Representation Summary:

Natural England welcomes the emphasis of the Preferred Strategy for Landscape Stewardship (Box 28, p.111) on a holistic protection of the natural environment, including undeveloped and remote areas, open landscape between defined settlements, and the urban fringe.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19373

Received: 17/02/2009

Respondent: Natural England

Representation Summary:

Natural England stresses the importance of protecting designated sites for nature conservation. Key issues are the impact of development in terms of recreational disturbance, water quality and pollution; expansion of adjacent development, such as industrial estates; and encroachments from small-scale development. Due consideration should also be given to the impacts on SSSI's that are not internationally designated. Growing activity linked to water sports such as kite and wind surfing at Camber Sands SSSI may be an increasing issue. A particular issue with Dungeness Romney Marsh and Rye Bay SSSI is the expansion of industrial development.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19374

Received: 17/02/2009

Respondent: Natural England

Representation Summary:

As the Council is aware, there is a proposal to extend Dungeness to Pett Level SPA and to designate some of the area as a Ramsar site. We have recently provided the Council with indicative maps and a list of interest features/ Please note that these will be in draft form and may be subject to change. Once DEFRA has given approval for the consultation period the SPA/Ramsar attains potential international status and will be protected as a matter of government policy. Due consideration should be given to these proposed changes in this and future Development Plan Documents. The HRA should take full account of these amendments.


Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19615

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Rother and Hastings CPRE

Representation Summary:

Box 28 This is paramount as a set of objectives.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19719

Received: 02/03/2009

Respondent: Messrs. Chishick, Commotto and Terry

Representation Summary:

We strongly support the specific reference in (ii) to the landscape setting of Winchelsea and Rye.

We believe that there is a need to specifically recognise the importance of the citadels and High Streets of historic towns like Winchelsea, Rye and Battle.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19852

Received: 04/02/2009

Respondent: Crowhurst Society

Representation Summary:

There needs to be a strong presumption against development in our most fragile areas. Vital to ensure survival of v), vi), vii), viii).

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19876

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: BALI

Representation Summary:

BALI supports the Preferred Strategy for Landscape Stewardship. It is pleased to note the recognition (12.3) that the "custodianship of such a beautiful natural and built district "as Rother "demands a high level of environmental stewardship". and that the Preferred Strategy is to protect and enhance "locally distinctive landscapes".

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19998

Received: 04/01/2009

Respondent: Rye Conservation Society

Representation Summary:

Should include here the strategic gap between Rock Channel and the industrial development at Rye Harbour Road.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 20003

Received: 25/11/2008

Respondent: Garden History Society

Representation Summary:

We strongly advise that consideration be given to including an appropriate policy in the Local Development Framework to give protection to sites on the English Heritage Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest and the local list of historic designed landscapes including public parks, cemeteries and gardens so that their character, appearance, setting and features can be safeguarded for the future. We would also ask that the policy indicates that there is a presumption against enabling development to accord with the English Heritage Policy Statement 'Enabling Development and the Conservation of Historic Assets'.
We note that there are 6 sites on the English Heritage Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in your District and ask that they be protected.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 20426

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: BWEA

Representation Summary:

Landscape and nature conservation designations should not be used in themselves to refuse planning permission for renewable energy developments. Planning applications for renewable energy developments in such areas should be assessed against criteria based policies set out in local development documents, including any criteria that are specific to the type of area concerned. Local authorities should ensure that any local approach to protecting landscape and townscape is consistent with PPS22 and does not preclude the supply of any type of renewable energy other than in the most exceptional circumstances.