Box 15 - Preferred Strategy for Rye and Rye Harbour

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 88

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19096

Received: 28/11/2008

Respondent: Mrs Lorna Hall

Representation Summary:

I query the population figures you use for Rye and Battle. You state that Rye has a population of 5,000 - last census shows population of 4,009 and that Battle has a population of 5,000 - last census shows population of 6,048. You can see that Rye and Battle are nearly 2,000 residents apart but are expected to accommodate a similar number of new houses in the preferred strategy figures. Pleases could you explain why?

Full text:

I query the population figures you use for Rye and Battle. You state that Rye has a population of 5,000 - last census shows population of 4,009 and that Battle has a population of 5,000 - last census shows population of 6,048. You can see that Rye and Battle are nearly 2,000 residents apart but are expected to accommodate a similar number of new houses in the preferred strategy figures. Pleases could you explain why?

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19116

Received: 16/01/2009

Respondent: mr roy dyer

Representation Summary:

When are we going to have a Rye by-pass? Too many large vehicles damage the roads and town, and are not suitable for the narrow roads of Rye.

Full text:

When are we going to have a Rye by-pass? Too many large vehicles damage the roads and town, and are not suitable for the narrow roads of Rye.

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19136

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr. Robert Dalton

Representation Summary:

misleading information about proposed increasing retail space in Rye centre. Unacceptable strategy on the creation of additional retail space.

Full text:

The strategy rightly notes the unique character and history of Rye. However, the propsal for the town centre is that 1,650sqm of additional convenience goods sales area is created. The summary of the strategy suggests that this will be provided through the construction of a further supermarket. Presumably this is becasue of the finding that only 10% of the Rye population do their "weekly shop" in Rye.

As I pointed out at the meeting on 16th January this floor space is ten times the size of Boots and three times the size of Budgens/Jempsons. It was crystal clear that hardly anyone in the audience (and seemingly on the platform) appreciated this fact.

It stands to reason that there is no room in Rye for two supermarkets let alone one of the size proposed. This is not reflected anywhere in the strategy. Accordingly to blandly propose such an increase in retail space in such a historically and economically sensitive location is a travesty. If a second supermarket is built with your approval what will be the effect on the Budgens' site and what will be the effect on the High Street? Has this consideration passed you by as it seems to have done judging by the planning officers' stumbling responses at the meeting?

I'm afraid that simply slipping in a mention of super area of 1,650m has not had the effect of drawing the implications of the strategy to everyone's attention. Why was this not exaplined? Why was no comparison drawn between the proposal and the size of existing shops?

Finally, I must register my very grave disappointment at the presentation made by the planning officers at the Rye meeting. Quite frankly I believe that it is wrong for an officer to turn up and simply read out the strategy in the jargon in which it is written. Surely it would have been appropriate to explain the strategy in lay terms which could have been understood by all?

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19156

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

Box 15 (a)(i) refers to the creation of employment floor space of 10-20,000 sq m. For Bexhill with a population 8 times that of Rye there is a need for only 60,000 sq m. I wonder therefore if the employment space is to provide for local employment or for the wider district. Is this sustainable?

I also question whether this amount of space will fit into the landscape setting of Rye.

Full text:

Box 15 (a)(i) refers tothe creation of employment floor space of 10-20,000 sq m. Fopr Bexhill with a population 8 times that of Rye there is a need for only 60,000 sq m. I wonder therefore if the employment space is to provide for local employment or for the wider district. Is this sustainable?

I also question whether this amount of space will fit into the landscape setting of Rye.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19157

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

Box15 b)I welcome the provision of improved facilities for life-long learning. The current provision of evening classes for adults is far from satisfactory. Given the desire to promote tourism accessable foreign language courses would be of great benefit.

Full text:

Box15 b)I welcome the provision of improved facilities for life-long learning. The current provision of evening classes for adults is far from satisfactory. Given the desire to promote tourism accessable foreign language courses would be of great benefit.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19158

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

Box 15 c) There is no reference to a green grid strategy for Rye. Currently Rye is blessed with a number of habitat corridors reaching into the urban area. A policy that recognises, protects and enhances these should be part of this strategy in line with government guidelines on green grids.

Full text:

Box 15 c) There is no reference to a green grid strategy for Rye. Currently Rye is blessed with a number of habitat corridors reaching into the urban area. A policy that recognises, protects and enhances these should be part of this strategy in line with government guidelines on green grids.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19159

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

Box 15 c) (ii) The views of the town when approaching by car, boat or on foot along footpaths is important. Any development will need to fit into the landscape and blend with the citidel in order to preserve these views. The example of the new school is one to avoid when looking at how new development should complement the area.

Full text:

Box 15 c) (ii) The views of the town when approaching by car, boat or on foot along footpaths is important. Any development will need to fit into the landscape and blend with the citidel in order to preserve these views. The example of the new school is one to avoid when looking at how new development should complement the area.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19160

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

Box 15 d) I support the provision of new footpaths and cycleways in order to help people avoid the heavy traffic on the A259.

There should also be a move to prevent the access of HGVs to the Citadel. These vehicles have been the cause of damage to the Landgate and cause unnecessary wear to the cobbled streets. How many medieval towns would allow this sort of traffic?

Full text:

Box 15 d) I support the provision of new footpaths and cycleways in order to help people avoid the heavy traffic on the A259.

There should also be a move to prevent the access of HGVs to the citidel. These vehicles have been the cause of damage to the Landgate and cause unnecessary wear to the cobbled streets. How many medieval towns would allow this sort of traffic?

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19161

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

Box 15 e) (ii) The provision of retail space of 1,650 sq m is too much. It would mean an area double that of Budgens/Jempsons which means a supermarket. There is no land available in the town centre and therefore it would have to be outside of the centre in contravention of government guidelines.

While quoting shopping studies to show the need for this space there does not appear to be a study to show the affects a supermarket would have on the town. This has been the downfall of many town centres in the SE.

Full text:

Box 15 e) (ii) The provision of retail space of 1,650 sq m is too much. It would mean an area double that of Budgens/Jempsons which means a supermarket. There is no land available in the town centre and therefore it would have to be outside of the centre in cotravention of government guidelines.

While quoting shopping studies to show the need for this space there does not appear to be a study to show the affects a supermarket would have on the town. This has been the downfall of many town centres in the SE.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19162

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

There is no reference to the Freda Gardham School site. While decisions are on hold while the flood risk is eleviated by works on the Rother, these are due to be completed by 2011. The plan is until 2026 and therefore this site should be part of this plan.

The risk is that housing and commercial allocations will be made and that in 2011 the Freda Gardenham site will be looked on as a widfall site and thus there will be additional development.

Full text:

There is no reference to the Freda Gardener School site. While decisions are on hold while the flood risk is eleviated by works on the Rother, these are due to be completed by 2011. The plan is until 2026 and therefore this site should be part of this plan.

The risk is that housing and commercial allocations will be made and that in 2011 the Freda Gardener site will be looked on as a widfall site and thus there will be additional development.

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19163

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

Box 15 f) The housing allocation is high at 450. This equates to 1 new house per 12 people which is the same as that proposed at Bexhill. Page 63 8.19 states that due to the sensitivity of Rye's location ".. it is not anticipated that the Core Strategy should propose that Rye have a high level of growth." But the figures show that proportionately Rye has the same level of housing growth as Bexhill and greater commercial growth.

This is a mis-representation.

Full text:

Box 15 f) The housing allocation is high at 450. This equates to 1 new house per 12 people which is the same as that proposed at Bexhill. Page 63 8.19 states that due to the sensitivity of Rye's location ".. it is not anticipated that the core strategy should propose that Rye have a high level of growth." But the figures show that proportionately Rye has the same level of housing growth as Bexhill and greater commercial growth.

This is a mis-representation.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19164

Received: 26/01/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Jennings

Representation Summary:

Box 15 f) The proposal is for 450 houses in the period 2006 - 2026. It quotes that most of these are covered by existing allocations and that there will only be a small additional requirement. However, I assume that the new development at Udimore Road that was not part of the old plan is included within this 450 and therefore the actual increase on the old allocations is actually much higher. This is not made clear in the document.

Full text:

Box 15 f) The proposal is for 450 houses in the period 2006 - 2026. It quotes that most of these are covered by existing allocations and that there will only be a small additional requirement. However, I assume that the new development at Udimore Road that was not part of the old plan is included within this 450 and therefore the actual increase on the old allocations is actually much higher. This is not made clear in the document.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19172

Received: 27/01/2009

Respondent: Tilling Valley Neighbourhood Group

Representation Summary:

- Cultural enhancement of town.
- Avoidance of congestion that would be inevitable if extra retail space were permitted in an inappropriate site.
- Improvement of rail transport.
- Development of amenity areas.

Full text:

a+b. Tourism, culture, recreation and amenity: We support the establishment of a theatre and arts centre - to be known as the Fletcher Festival Theatre - as an enhancement of our historic town. There is no other venue larger than Rye College available as a drama and performance space. Such a venue would provide a magnet for tourists and contribute to the life of the town.

e.11 - It is our strong opinion that the Lower School site is inappropriate for retail marketing as the entrance would be within yards of the Ferry Road level crossing and the additional volume of traffic could not be contained within such restricted access.

d. We urge the improvement of the Marsh Link as we are at present deprived of late transport out of and into Rye necessitating the use of car or taxi.

b+f. We are concerned that our open spaces are protected. We further suggest that the Lower School site could be partially developed as a play area and green site in conjunction with the social housing which is presently expected to be built. For instance there are no public tennis courts in Rye.




Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19258

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Aroncorp Ltd

Agent: Broadlands

Representation Summary:

The text at section f) - For development and housing - should be amended with the housing numbers increased to 1,100 dwellings in accordance with the Option 5 figure, (deleting references to the service centre role, considerable environmental, economic and accessibility constraints), acknowledging the planning permission granted on the Local Plan reserve site at Udimore Road as a commitment and reflecting the same in the definition of development boundaries and identifying the balance of the respondent's land holding at Udimore Road, to the west and south of the area benefitting from planning permission as suitable for residential development.

Full text:

The text at section f) - For development and housing - should be amended with the housing numbers increased to provide for up to 1,100 dwellings in accordance with the Option 5 - Housing Needs based figure (paragraph 5.36) (deleting references to the service centre role and considerable environmental, economic and accessibility constraints), acknowledging the planning permission granted on the Local Plan reserve site at Udimore Road as a commitment and reflecting the same in the definition of development boundaries (see representations under Box 5) and identifying the balance of the respondent's land holding at Udimore Road, to the west and south of the area already benefitting from planning permission as suitable for residential development.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19267

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Cllr Mary Smith

Representation Summary:

A full planning brief,as done for Rock Channel, is required for the former school sites, Freda Gardham, Tilling Green and Thomas Peacocke Lower School. The area is large and strategically important and its future use needs to be determined carefully in the best interests of Rye.

Full text:

A full planning brief,as done for Rock Channel, is required for the former school sites, Freda Gardham, Tilling Green and Thomas Peacocke Lower School. The area is large and strategically important and its future use needs to be determined carefully in the best interests of Rye.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19268

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Cllr Mary Smith

Representation Summary:

Need appropriate strategy for traffic management to protect fabric and character of the citadel area. Needs restriction on tonnage of vehicles. Cobbled areas being damaged, Landgate Arch damaged by vehicles. Needs repairs made in keeping with heritage site, ie not cobbles into concrete and no use of tarmac for repair of cobbled areas

Full text:

Need appropriate strategy for traffic management to protect fabric and character of the citadel area. Needs restriction on tonnage of vehicles. Cobbled areas being damaged, Landgate Arch damaged by vehicles. Needs repairs made in keeping with heritage site, ie not cobbles into concrete and no use of tarmac for repair of cobbled areas

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19269

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Cllr Mary Smith

Representation Summary:

Recognise the economic and social advantage of the development of a cultural centre for Rye, including an area to serve as both theatre and cinema. This development would be a central focal point for the town.

Full text:

Recognise the economic and social advantage of the development of a cultural centre for Rye, including an area to serve as both theatre and cinema. This development would be a central focal point for the town.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19270

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Cllr Mary Smith

Representation Summary:

Rye is in process of achieving status as a Fairtrade Town. This contributes to Rye's development as a centre of sustainable tourism

Full text:

Rye is in process of achieving ststus as a Fairtrade Town. This contributes to Rye's development as a centre of sustainable tourism

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19271

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Cllr Mary Smith

Representation Summary:

Flood risk in Rye is recognised as very complex. Concerns about risk still neeed to be addressed. Situation should be subject to regular reassessment and monitored and managed effectively. There should be full public scrutiny and full information available to residents.

Full text:

Flood risk in Rye is recognised as very complex. Concerns about risk still neeed to be addressed. Situation should be subject to regular reassessment and monitored and managed effectively. There should be full public scrutiny and full information available to residents.

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19272

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Cllr Mary Smith

Representation Summary:

Object to number of houses allocated to Rye, equivalent to 1 house for every 12 people. Bexhill's allocation is 1 house to 12.5 people. Rye's allocation is therefore disproportionate as Rye faces considerable constraints as a historic town. Infrastructure is inadequate. Employment prospects are weak and new development proposed at Rye Harbour would not be sufficient for new householders. Already heavy congestion on A259.

Full text:

Object to number of houses allocated to Rye, equivalent to 1 house for every 12 people. Bexhill's allocation is 1 house to 12.5 people. Rye's allocation is therefore disproportionate as Rye faces considerable constraints as a historic town. Infrastructure is inadequate. Employment prospects are weak and new development proposed at Rye Harbour would not be sufficient for new householders. Already heavy congestion on A259.

Object

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19273

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Cllr Mary Smith

Representation Summary:

Propose a full consultation process with residents re proposed retail development. Issue splits community. Community should have say on what should happen including on site and provider. Proposal in Strategy document imposes a disproportionately large development not related to other retail outlets in area.

Full text:

Propose a full consultation process with residents re proposed retail development. Issue splits community. Community should have say on what should happen including on site and provider. Proposal in Strategy document imposes a disproportionately large development not related to other retail outlets in area.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19274

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Cllr Mary Smith

Representation Summary:

Place embargo on development on or close to land adjacent to the railway line that might hamper essential improvements ie dual tracking and electrification.

Full text:

Place embargo on development on or close to land adjacent to the railway line hat might hamper essential improvements ie dual tracking and electrification.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19277

Received: 29/01/2009

Respondent: Cllr Mary Smith

Representation Summary:

To facilitate community centre on Tilling Green estate of a size sufficient for community needs.

Full text:

To facilitate community centre on Tilling Green estate of a size sufficient for community needs.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19325

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Romney Holdings Ltd

Agent: Rural Partners Ltd

Representation Summary:

In principle Romney Holdings Ltd support the Preferred Strategy for Rye and Rye Harbour, however they question the strategy(Section eii) for the Town Centre.
Sustaining a viable Rye Town Centre is accepted and supported, but it is felt that siting additional shopping provision on Harbour Road, adjacent to Rye Harbour should not be over looked.

(Section fii) It is understood that some of these sites do not currently have the benefit of adequate flood defence and would question the wisdom of putting to much reliance on this problem being resolved. It is therefore felt that other brownfield sites in Rye and Rye Harbour should be considered for allocation.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19327

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Romney Holdings Ltd

Agent: Rural Partners Ltd

Representation Summary:

In principle Romney Holdings Ltd support the Preferred Strategy for Rye and Rye Harbour, they would however question the following
Section fiii) regarding allocation.
This policy misses out exploring sites to the south east of Rye, namely sites on Harbour Road adjacent to Rye Harbour. It is believed there is some logic in considering sites adjacent to Rye Harbour as they would be adjacent to the area zoned for employment , therefore reducing commuter traffic across Rye to the Rye Harbour Employment Area.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19328

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Romney Holdings Ltd

Agent: Romney Holdings Ltd

Representation Summary:

Romney Holdings Ltd owns Churchfield a site which is a brown field site.

The site adjoins Rye Harbour and could be developed so as to improve the setting of the Church, by developing the area in the vicinity of the Church with housing with some employment related development on the periphery.
This option was not previously available as the site had been substantially developed, however the fire last year provides an opportunity to reconsider the development of Churchfields.
Romney Holdings Ltd would support in principle the ideas being promoted by the Rye Conservation Society for the River Rother from Rye out to the sea and for Rye Harbour.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19329

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Rastrum Ltd

Agent: Romney Holdings Ltd

Representation Summary:

Rastrum Ltd support the Preferred Strategy for Rye and Rye Harbour, they however question Section e) For the Town Centre
The importance of sustaining a viable Rye Town Centre is fully accepted and supported, however it is felt that the possibility of siting some additional shopping provision on Harbour road adjacent to Rye Harbour should not be over looked.
Section f) It is understood that some of these sites do not currently have the benefit of adequate flood defence. Too much reliance on this problem being resolved in the foreseeable future should not be given. It is felt that other sites be considered for allocation.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19330

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Rastrum Ltd

Agent: Romney Holdings Ltd

Representation Summary:

In principle Rastrum Ltd support the Preferred Strategy for Rye and Rye Harbour, they would however question the following
Section fiii) Development and Housing:
This policy seems to miss out exploring the potential of sites to the South East of Rye, namely sites on Harbour Road adjacent to Rye Harbour.
It is believed there is some logic in considering sites adjacent to Rye Harbour as they would be adjacent to the area zoned for employment, and would therefore reduce commuter traffic across Rye to the Rye Harbour Employment Area that would result from sites to the north and west.

Comment

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19331

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Rastrum Ltd

Agent: Romney Holdings Ltd

Representation Summary:

Rastrum Ltd own the Saltings which extends to 7.25 ha located next to Rye
Wharf on the edge of Rye Harbour.
The site is placed to accommodate future development either retail, housing or industrial.
The site has good road frontage and is surrounded on the East by Rye Wharf, the South by Churchfields and the West by Industrial Development.
There are significant opportunities to expand trade through Rye Wharf and it is therefore important that provision is made in the plan for additional wharfage capacity on the Saltings.
Further economic activity could be attracted to Harbour Road with developments similar to the Atlas Stone and Castle Waters sites.

Support

Core Strategy Consultation on Strategy Directions 2008

Representation ID: 19349

Received: 30/01/2009

Respondent: Sea Space

Representation Summary:

The identification of the Rock Channel area for employment development is supported.