Comment

Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule and Regulation 123 List

Representation ID: 21656

Received: 25/09/2014

Respondent: MichaelDHall Building Design Services Ltd

Agent: MichaelDHall Building Design Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

I do not agree with the charging schedule based as it presumably is on a claimed shortfall of £133 million in turn reflecting an unrealistic aspiration for the district. The rates are unaffordable for housebuilders save perhaps for a few high volume national developers. The small developer, often building the better quality small or larger dwellings, will be moreorless kicked into touch.

Full text:

I do not agree with the charging schedule based as it presumably is on a claimed shortfall of £133 million in turn reflecting an unrealistic aspiration for the district. The rates are unaffordable for housebuilders save perhaps for a few high volume national developers. The small developer, often building the better quality small or larger dwellings, will be moreorless kicked into touch.