Object
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21572
Received: 27/09/2013
Respondent: Rother and Hastings CPRE
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Please see our comments on Mod 7.11 (see below) which are relevant here and the whole mod needs re-writing to ensure that windfall sites in villages ARE counted towards the allocations each village has.
Mod 7.11: We support the amendment emphasising absolutely the words from ' without prejudicing...' These words we feel should underpin any subsequent discussion about housing numbers and we believe that they are not so respected in subsequent paragraphs of the draft plan.
Please see our comments on Mod 7.11 (see below) which are relevant here and the whole mod needs re-writing to ensure that windfall sites in villages ARE counted towards the allocations each village has.
Mod 7.11: We support the amendment emphasising absolutely the words from ' without prejudicing...' These words we feel should underpin any subsequent discussion about housing numbers and we believe that they are not so respected in subsequent paragraphs of the draft plan.