Object
Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy
Representation ID: 21407
Received: 16/09/2013
Respondent: Mr John (Frederick) Stevens
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
1. 5-2.9. There would be further congestion with more vehicles in the village
2. NPFF - Point 103. The proposed development must exacerbate the flood risk.
3. NPFF - Point 80. With the development proposed this village would be more like a town as we've already had a 40% increase of the number of houses in the last 10 years. More houses would spoil for ever its rural 'character'.
4. NPFF - Point 109. More houses in an 'area of outstanding beauty' would be both damaging and irresponsible.
1. 5-2.9. There would be further congestion with more vehicles in the village
2. NPFF - Point 103. The proposed development must exacerbate the flood risk.
3. NPFF - Point 80. With the development proposed this village would be more like a town as we've already had a 40% increase of the number of houses in the last 10 years. More houses would spoil for ever its rural 'character'.
4. NPFF - Point 109. More houses in an 'area of outstanding beauty' would be both damaging and irresponsible.