Object

Main Modifications to the Proposed Submission Core Strategy

Representation ID: 21402

Received: 25/09/2013

Respondent: kathryn Bell

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Propose extra houses do not comply with Rother District Council's Sustainabilty appraisal in 2 ways: retaining the character of the vilage and minimising risk of flooding.

Full text:

Main modification unsound: Robertsbridge.
I believe the higher number of houses is unsound because
1 it does not meet Rother's sustainability appraisal aim that, "The key test for growth is te villages is whether it reflectsthe vision to refect their distinctive,individual character and qualities ". To increase the size of the village in this way would alter the character- Since the bypass was built, cars have parked on the high street, supporting access to local businesses. This means the street is effectively one way, acting as a traffic calming measure and enabling people to cross the road easily. More people and more cars would make it difficult to retain this, which is so important in making the High Street a place to meet people as well as shop.
2. The sustainabiity appraisal alsorefers to minimising the risk of flooding- more ghouses will increase not minimise the risk of flooding.